Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reports: MacKenzie Lueck's alleged killer was banned from USU campus, accused of rape
SABBM:
According to records from Utah State University, Ajayi was banned from the campusin 2012 after a theft investigation.
He also appeared to be living in a janitor's closet and at various buildings around campus.
At one point, campus officials notified Ajayi that his visa had lapsed and that he was no longer eligible to take classes, the report states.
Documents from police about a 2014 investigation in North Logan showed Ajayi was accused of raping a woman.
Indeed. Absolutely correct.
Yet...
Officials at Utah State University said Ajayi attended the school three separate times for short periods between 2009 and 2016.
Ayoola Ajayi, suspected in killing of Mackenzie Lueck, lived a life of contradictions
That is who I thought of too...Jesse Matthew...very similar method of manipulating young woman to gain their trust...with terrible intent and tragic outcomes, and their crimes escalating in depravity.I see shades of Jesse Matthew's. Another heartless rapist turned murderer who wanted to become a serial killer.
I think we are going to see more, and more come out about AA.
Imo, his been dangerous for quite awhile.
Jmho
Agreed.I imagine this is just the tip of the iceberg!
JMO
I see shades of Jesse Matthew's. Another heartless rapist turned murderer who wanted to become a serial killer.
I think we are going to see more, and more come out about AA.
Imo, his been dangerous for quite awhile.
Jmho
On #2, I’m not sure other than that it is natural for a mother to first consider the danger her children may have been in if a violent man had stuck around. For #1 I suspect that’s just how this woman thinks of college age kids. Technically, at 23 she was a young woman. But many of us in our 30s and 40s and beyond do tend to still think of them as kids, girls, or boys. I think calling her a child is simply a cultural thing. The African Americans I’ve been friends with are more likely to use the term child when I might say kid. JMO.Some things from the interview with his wife that I found interesting:
1) At the time of her interview she was aware of the allegations against him and yet she specifically made this comment:
"If he took an innocent child he needs to spend his life in jail"
Why is she specifically saying "child" when children were not specifically brought up by the interviewer or within the current charge against him?
2) Directly after that she added the following:
"If they need me to come to court and testify against him, I’ll tell them how he was aggressive and controlling. This could have happened to me. This could have happened to my child"
Again, why mention children?
3) How did her Aunt know the individual and come to such a relationship where she was prepared to introduce him to her niece?
4) He was clearly in a financial position, even in 2011, to fully pay for this woman/her kids daily life:
"My kids liked him. He used to buy them clothes, do stuff for them. He paid for my apartment, my childcare, everything"
5) This woman was in Texas, AA seemingly traveled there for the sole purpose of marrying her, he then proceeded to pay for/support her and her kids (who weren't his children), he then decided to go back to his "home town" in Utah and yet continued to financially support her/her children despite the fact that his wife claims the marriage never included sex & by all indications wasn't even a marriage of a couple living/communicating as one. In other words, it appears more like a financial arrangement which I further consider to be a plausible conclusion based on her statement about threats should she ever "talk to anyone".
Items for Consideration:
a) Finances and where his seemingly large income is coming from.
b) Military records - DD214 is a public record and accessible if requested. His military service makes zero sense and this raises serious questions as to various issues surrounding it including why the Army would send him to the armory at Tooele.
c) Connection to local "Resist" group as a "Coordinator" and local modeling groups. In both cases the door would be open to meet a very large amount of people, women specifically, children as well.
d) McKenzie Lueck appeared to be a very social person and her close girlfriends not knowing about AA raises questions relating to when she met him. Various speculation abound about this issue but my personal opinion is this was a recent development. If true this raises the question about his April statement about his "white Mormon girlfriend" coming from "out of town". In essence, was he referring to Lueck or another situation? If Lueck then his planning for these events began in April and he has known her for two or so months (at least). Was she out of area in April?
e) April to late June is a long enough time to have sought out and potentially found a different contractor to create his "room". Was he able to achieve this in the time between his request to the contractor who went public and recently?
f) From 2017 to 2019 the home itself went through a large renovation if you compare the previous Google image search to what the home is currently. Any home owner knows that such a large renovation to every single area of the home would take a great deal of money (will add image comparison if needed). Was the home renovated before or after his purchase?
g) Thinking outside the box - The neighbors claimed people came and went from the home and yet there were only five reviews as an Airbnb rental. Perhaps he was advertising on other sites/avenues such as Craigslist or through the local Resist message forums. Something to consider at least if any wish to expand on research directions.
h) Why Kenzie specifically? Was she picked because of accessibility or did something specifically happen. This is a man who has a history of not wanting to be talked about or known about. So why Kenzie?
No it sure doesn’t add up. He had some other source of income. I bet his digital trail is leading LE to all kinds of things.That is the big question for me. How does an IT tech support specialist afford that house and all the renovations? He had to have another source of income. From what I can find employees in this industry in Utah make $30k-50k per year. Doesn’t add up.
Video taping and uploading live his crimes on TorBrowser could explain a cash flow that underpinned his daily expenses...renting a room out for $4o.00 a night in his house seems nothing more than a means to an end--a way to share voyeuristic video tape of unwitting guests with his deep web audience.He claims to have worked at Goldman Sachs and one of the articles about the rape mentions that they worked together at a “financial services” company.
And someone should definitely alert West Point about that video.
Thanks for the correction! It certainly does lend credence.He was baptized in October 2009, just three months after arriving in the US, which lends credence to the theory that he was sponsored by the LDC community.
LDS missionary recalls baptism of accused killer in MacKenzie Lueck case
....
There is already way too much evidence against him already known showing this was a very organized well thoughtout premediatated murder plan. And the evidence is only going to get worse in the ongoing investigation.
Imo
No it sure doesn’t add up. He had some other source of income. I bet his digital trail is leading LE to all kinds of things.
Was it ever reported that LE took possession of computer equipment? I assume they did.
And this is so disturbing! I just had a conversation with someone about this as we were staying in an expensive hotel. He suggested AirBnB, and went on and on about how wonderful it was. I'm sure most of the situations are perfectly fine, but my first thought was about concealed cameras!Video taping and uploading live his crimes on TorBrowser could explain a cash flow that underpinned his daily expenses...renting a room out for $4o.00 a night in his house seems nothing more than a means to an end--a way to share voyeuristic video tape of unwitting guests with his deep web audience.
There seems to be a common pattern of ingratiating behavior among several high profile killers...they use political (i.e., John Gacy and Ira Einhorn) as well as religious arenas to build their interpersonal skills and gain social acceptance...after which, when they have succeeded in building a stable platform from which to operate from, they begin in earnest a lifestyle of deceit and mayhem.He was baptized in October 2009, just three months after arriving in the US, which lends credence to the theory that he was sponsored by the LDC community.
LDS missionary recalls baptism of accused killer in MacKenzie Lueck case
I agree and TOR is just one of many avenues to the deepest parts of the web. Voyeurism might be just the tip of the iceberg on what this guy has been creating.Video taping and uploading live his crimes on TorBrowser could explain a cash flow that underpinned his daily expenses...renting a room out for $4o.00 a night in his house seems nothing more than a means to an end--a way to share voyeuristic video tape of unwitting guests with his deep web audience.
- Rape Allegation
- Theft Investigation
- Clearly issues with military service as nobody can serve without BMT/Tech School
- Unknown large sources of income
- Stated education from UK school
- Removed from American campus due to VISA lapse
- Able to finance a woman and her four children for years
How the hell did this one slip through notice.
Video taping and uploading live his crimes on TorBrowser could explain a cash flow that underpinned his daily expenses...renting a room out for $4o.00 a night in his house seems nothing more than a means to an end--a way to share voyeuristic video tape of unwitting guests with his deep web audience.
MOO his most likely path to the US was the LDS, helping him get to USU.
I’m worried about his defense trying to use his book as evidence of him “acting reasonably.” I know it sounds crazy, but hear me out. Defense puts on an accidental death defense and then somehow adequately explains all of the actions that look premeditated to us - the park, her phone, etc. So then, there isn’t much forensic evidence because he burned it all, so COD isn’t provable. Then they say him burning her was reasonable for him in his panicked, upset state when he found her dead because of his traumatic childhood where he regularly witnessed bodies being disposed of by being burned. He just went in autopilot mode and did what he did because of the culture he grew up in. Then they will show his book as evidence of this. Then they will drag some expert in who will say witnessing burning people in childhood could have led to poor decision making with ML’s body. Hopefully a jury won’t be that dumb. Now - can it be proven that his book is fiction or true? Does it claim to be autobiographical or fiction?