2 whole minutes of my life that I will never get back.
Thank you, zapped.
2 whole minutes of my life that I will never get back.
The 50k fundraising page and its torturous prose ... I really thought it was a joke - as in, "let's see how fast ws'ers pick up on this and ramble on about it" (ummm, like I am doing now). Clicked on the FB link at the bottom, and that just added to my suspicion. If it is real, and if JH allowed her name to be on it, she has been seriously ill-advised. Please, would one of you JH friends or relatives intervene and suggest she take her name off of it? There are already so many established organizations to help find the missing over sm. Please channel your efforts into those groups and ask for their help in finding AJ.So worth skipping would you say? In the sense that, should I bother to look at it?
Maybe I am about to get my hand slapped, but have you clicked on this new Community FB page in the past hour? The one that is linked at the bottom of the new fundraising page? Since that FB page does not have a person's name on it or attached to it, can I post it here? Anyway, more weird to add to the weird.
What the heck is that post...? This case seems to just keep getting more bizarre.
What the heck is that post...? This case seems to just keep getting more bizarre.
The 50k fundraising page and its torturous prose ... I really thought it was a joke - as in, "let's see how fast ws'ers pick up on this and ramble on about it" (ummm, like I am doing now). Clicked on the FB link at the bottom, and that just added to my suspicion. If it is real, and if JH allowed her name to be on it, she has been seriously ill-advised. Please, would one of you JH friends or relatives intervene and suggest she take her name off of it? There are already so many established organizations to help find the missing over sm. Please channel your efforts into those groups and ask for their help in finding AJ.
Appears an awful lot like a thinly veiled threat, broadcast to hundreds of thousands of people, to me.
Appears an awful lot like a thinly veiled threat, broadcast to hundreds of thousands of people, to me.
This is an interesting point and one that I am sure experienced WSers are familiar with (I am not experienced) ... I have been reading since the first post on thread 1, and the collective thinking, reasoning, and surmising in these threads has been amazing to read as it unfolds. However, I have also noticed how what was once alleged by WH has sometimes become "fact," even more so as time goes on. I'll call it the "word salad creep" ... so many garbled facts, so many strange twists that it all gets mushed into a new truth. It is no wonder this happens and I am not judging anyone. Here is a "fact" that has bothered me: Wes was interviewed by LE for 15 hours. I have seen that repeated over and over here and in msm, but how do we know this is true? Isn't that another "fact" from Mr. Word Salad? I never saw this info from LE (if you did, please alert me). That is probably a bad example because really, does it matter how long he was interviewed? But you get the idea. Half truths or no truths easily become "fact." Thankfully, since his last JF interview, we haven't had much more word salad. Of course we haven't really had much news at all....That's what I thought! Once again, I believe the collective "we" are going right where WH wanted us to--after enough time has passed people will start to remember things he said as "fact" as opposed to just his word in a jailhouse interview.
Thanks for clarifying and resetting me!
The 50k fundraising page and its torturous prose ... I really thought it was a joke - as in, "let's see how fast ws'ers pick up on this and ramble on about it" (ummm, like I am doing now). Clicked on the FB link at the bottom, and that just added to my suspicion. If it is real, and if JH allowed her name to be on it, she has been seriously ill-advised. Please, would one of you JH friends or relatives intervene and suggest she take her name off of it? There are already so many established organizations to help find the missing over sm. Please channel your efforts into those groups and ask for their help in finding AJ.
NOW the question to ask is this...if LE had AJ's phone ping info on March 13, why did they wait until yesterday to follow up on "a ping at the pond?" Is it possible they just told the neighbors they were following up on a phone ping because they didn't want to disclose the true nature of the tip? Or is the news story incorrect in reporting that the search on the 13th was because of a phone ping? This is like playing Jenga, I swear.
This is an interesting point and one that I am sure experienced WSers are familiar with (I am not experienced) ... I have been reading since the first post on thread 1, and the collective thinking, reasoning, and surmising in these threads has been amazing to read as it unfolds. However, I have also noticed how what was once alleged by WH has sometimes become "fact," even more so as time goes on. I'll call it the "word salad creep" ... so many garbled facts, so many strange twists that it all gets mushed into a new truth. It is no wonder this happens and I am not judging anyone. Here is a "fact" that has bothered me: Wes was interviewed by LE for 15 hours. I have seen that repeated over and over here and in msm, but how do we know this is true? Isn't that another "fact" from Mr. Word Salad? I never saw this info from LE (if you did, please alert me). That is probably a bad example because really, does it matter how long he was interviewed? But you get the idea. Half truths or no truths easily become "fact." Thankfully, since his last JF interview, we haven't had much more word salad. Of course we haven't really had much news at all....
(Back to lurking I go ... you all so often say what I am thinking and say it better than I could!)
This is an interesting point and one that I am sure experienced WSers are familiar with (I am not experienced) ... I have been reading since the first post on thread 1, and the collective thinking, reasoning, and surmising in these threads has been amazing to read as it unfolds. However, I have also noticed how what was once alleged by WH has sometimes become "fact," even more so as time goes on. I'll call it the "word salad creep" ... so many garbled facts, so many strange twists that it all gets mushed into a new truth. It is no wonder this happens and I am not judging anyone. Here is a "fact" that has bothered me: Wes was interviewed by LE for 15 hours. I have seen that repeated over and over here and in msm, but how do we know this is true? Isn't that another "fact" from Mr. Word Salad? I never saw this info from LE (if you did, please alert me). That is probably a bad example because really, does it matter how long he was interviewed? But you get the idea. Half truths or no truths easily become "fact." Thankfully, since his last JF interview, we haven't had much more word salad. Of course we haven't really had much news at all....
(Back to lurking I go ... you all so often say what I am thinking and say it better than I could!)