Seriously? People are killed for their cell phones these days. That the shirt didn't meet the pants means the shirt didn't cover her phone if she tucked in her waist band.
Interesting! I hadn't considered that autocorrect could be at play. I am constantly sending nonsensical (or worse, sensical but autocorrected to be wrong) texts. Also, I forgot that the battery isn't removable. Don't cell phones send signals even when off if the battery is alive? Isn't this what got some criminals in trouble in the early days cell phones -- that they thought turning their cell phone off was enough to hide their movements?
I asked this before but unsure if I got an answer. Does anyone who attended UVA know if they teach awareness to incoming freshman? Do they have a volunteer escort service women can call at night? What about the blue emergency lights/phones?
I went to a school where rape had happened a few times over the years and our school was incredibly proactive in informing it's students. It was also a huge party school. I was never allowed to walk alone- my MALE friends made sure of it every single time, no matter the inconvenience to them.
Seriously, People carry their cell phones in their hands and those people are not killed daily for phones. If I tuck a phone in my pants it is safer there then in my purse that is hanging/dangling off of my shoulder, seriously.
From the UVA PD Crime Reports: Pay close attention to September 14th. It says that the female student was sexually assaulted in the early morning hours of September 13th. That is the same night that Hannah disappeared.
http://www.virginia.edu/uvapolice/safety.html
My kids' small, private school background checks everyone who volunteers in any capacity.
My husband is the president of our local little league, and has been in similar positions for years. He is in charge of background checks for coaches, assistants, team moms, concession stand people - any volunteer. The guidelines really only speak to crimes against children, sex crimes, and violent felonies. There are coaches with DUI, vehicular manslaughter, and other non-felony convictions. Based on what has been posted here I am not surprised he would pass a youth sports background check. I am not saying I agree with it, just that I'm not surprised he would be allowed to coach given his current record.
Has any information been released about what was found in the search?
Nobody is getting killed over a cell phone. They are a dime a dozen. The type of person who would even try to mug you for a cell phone is not the same type of person that did something to Hannah.
I think you guys are really trying to over think this whole scenario.
Hannah and JM went and got drinks. JM got her in his car and back to his apartment willingly. From there the specifics are not really important, but whatever happened caused Hannah's death.
JM disposed of her and now its a case of recovery and proving it.
It all seems pretty cut and dry to me.
Do they rerun them every year if it's a regular volunteer / known person? That's the part I haven't seen / experienced. Except that we rechecked the sex offender one, and then do rerun them completely every couple of years.
Definitely similar to what I see as far as what most places consider an issue record wise also. I'd think the not typically rerunning a full check yearly in many places is probably actually related to that (the list of offenses that would be a "no") since in most cases those types of charges would be far more likely to be known when they occurred anyway and thus handled long before another check were to be run.
If it's a someone in a position to drive, in which case a DUI or driving related one would also be an issue (and in driving positions, records were checked yearly and new proof of insurance was required)
And I definitely agree with you as far as it pertaining to JM and what we have seen to be on his record at this point likely not excluding him.
There are tons of rural areas in Virginia that one could easily hide a body.
This bothers me, too. She sent a text to someone in particular. She said she was lost. She asked to be looked for. Did anyone bother to look for her? Did no one know where she intended to go when she left the party? Was she that secretive, or that much of a loner? She seemed quite sociable to me. JMO
Her friends may have been just as impaired.
At 1:06 a.m. she texted friends that she was lost. She sent other texts, but police have said none of them reflected fear or panic.
In response to the above, yes UVA definitely teaches awareness to incoming freshmen, especially after the MH case. Yes they have a free ride program available to students. There are blue light phones but only on campus/grounds. Where she lived was not on campus but about 4 blocks away from the undergrad campus. It is actually closer to the medical center. Even though she had only lived in her new apt for a few weeks, the area in which she lived was only a block or two from the "Corner" which is an area across from campus with restaurants, Starbucks etc. The first party she went to sounds like it was a block from her house and only a block from the Corner, which I'm sure she was very familiar with because it's where students go to eat and hang out because it's walking distance.
When she left the party and started walking, it seems that she would have realized pretty quickly that she was lost/heading in the wrong direction and turned around if she had not been pretty drunk/high. She was within a block of Main Street when she left that party and a block of her house.