QUOTE...
I am a bit interested though in the type of tool mark left on the wires when they were cut.
This might match the type of tools carried by telephone workers or might not
or the marks might show a wire cut made by someone not trained to work with
such wires...END OF QUOTE...
That is a good quote.
I to would like to know the answer to that question.
Thank You for the kind words.
They could have seen using there tools, if the cut was back and forth or straight
threw the line like a snip. Which would tell us if it was a knife or a *snip tool(*wire cutter).
Mr short being in the moving business, it would seem perhaps someone working
for him was using tools to cut/snip wires somewhere in the mobile home before moving.
A tool one would have carried in there utility belt perhaps. . .
Very possible but in most of the cases I ran across in my simple web search the line cutting appeared
to be planned. If one planned to cut wires then one brought a cutting tool to the crime.
To plan to cut a phone line but not bring a tool to use would seem to indicate the killer knew in advance
such a tool would indeed be there to use and would not need to waste time looking for something
& was willing to risk being seen when picking up the tool from whereever it was normally stored before
entering the home to commit the crime.
An employee could certainly have done the deed but I think LE would have solved it a
long time ago if that was the case.
At moment I am leaning towards it being someone who brought his own kill kit with him
(I do not know if this indicates a grudge kill or a serial killer since I do not know
the condition and details of the bodies found- the stuff not in the news reports.)
& who
had driven through the area before, somone who might have been choosing a person to victimize
and a place to dispose of the body.
Maybe not an expert on the area but someone who took a look around a time or two.
If Jennifer was his chosen victim then where did he see her to choose her? Had her pic appeared online?
:+:MrTT:+: said:
But my real question about the phone line was this.
If the Shorts had cell phones, why cut/snip the land-line phone?
Sorry, I do not know if they had cells or not but not all killers were thinking
about cell phone coverage back then. I know this because in at least one or
two of the cases I recently websearched (about cutting phonelines in murder
& attempted murder cases) the perp cut the landlines only to be foiled when
the victim was able to call out on their cell phone.
Still if you are a killer but don't know for sure if the victims have a cell phone then
cutting the land line helps cut down on the odds of them calling out for help.
I don't know if the perp took much time in the home or not.
(I wonder if luminol or other evidence showed if the home was searched by the killer.)
But he was going into a home with at least 3 people inside so cutting the odds
by cutting the landline seems like a few seconds worth spending.
This crime has some minor odd twists that I haven't yet sorted out.
Some things make me think of a younger killer and some make
me think of an older killer. For now I am guessing the age at somewhere between
25 and 32, young enough to think like a young person & yet having lived long
enough to begin planning ahead a bit.
I am guessing there is some evidence being held back from the public
and I do not know
if it indicates that this crime was a personal grudge or a crime committed by a stranger
robber/killer or a serial killer.