Cardinal47
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2009
- Messages
- 3,978
- Reaction score
- 8,766
I understand your point that LE should make best use of the resources they have. But I think it is important to realize that there is only so much that good logistics can achieve. If they had 100 people on standby then what would those people do the majority of the time they were not needed?
I'm sure they have a phone bank set up to field calls the people they take the information and pass it to the investigators. The investigators then prioritizes these based on what they feel is the likely hood of them 'bearing fruit" and they then start contacting people back. I agree that it should be easy to bring on temps or even volunteers to man the phones. But I have not heard anyone complain about not being able to get thru to them. The complaints are they have not been contacted back or not contacted in a timely manner. In order to have people to contact them back requires two important things:
1. They have to be professionally trained in investigation and interviewing witnesses.
2. They have to be "plugged-in" to everything that is going on with the case and be up to date on all the aspects of this.
Then there has to be further people to collect and analyze all this information in the big picture. While initially having these 100 people on call that can step in seems like an obvious simply solution, when you really stop and look at it I don't think it reasonable thing to think that in most, if not all areas, there are 100 people who are qualified to do this that can jump in at the drop of a hat. That is simply is not the case. Its not like with a disaster where you need to people to hand out water or serve food, things almost any volunteer can do. To follow up leads they need trained professionals.
Beyond that if you assumed (in my opinion unrealistically) that these people where available it quickly becomes an issue of trying to manger something of this nature with people that have never worked together before. After a certain number of investigators additional people start to provide diminishing returns until the point where beyond a certain number of people there is no benefit to having more people.
And lastly you could say well we will make up the 100 by pulling in all the detectives from various agencies in the state. Well all those detective have cases, missing persons, murder investigations they are working on where they are. How can they just leave what they are doing? That would mean you are saying that Morgan is somehow more important than the many other people at any moment that are victims of violent crime and thats not right. In going to the moon there is only one moon and you are only trying to go there a finite number of times. What needs to be understood is across this country there are hundreds of people (if not more) that go missing every day and there are thousands (if not more) people that are murdered very day we cannot stop everything to solve these cases and we can't stop everything just to solve any one of them.
In the world resources are always limited period no matter what b/c anyone who is doing one thing can't be doing something else. I hate what happened to Morgan and I too want it resolved yesterday, but no matter how we feel about it life on planet earth can't come to a screeching halt while we all look for her I wish it could but it can't. How could we look at one family and say we have to temporarily stop looking for your missing family member so the detectives can go look for this other person....we can't...or at least we shouldn't. There is only so much resource's that can be applied to this and we can all not like it, but we have to accept it.
If you want to talk about specifics that they are not doing right thats fine Im sure there are many. But I dont think we can say that there doing it wrong all they have to do is X when doing X is not realistic.
All I am saying is maybe some of those resources were busy leading up to and on election day??????