This might help. It is a topic that shows all the posting from Dan Harrington. The one I referred to is included.
All Posts by Dan Harrington - Help Find Morgan Harrington
Thank you for your help.
The dates of DH's comments might be helpful, too.
The Hook's coverage seems authoritative and thorough; but reading this comment, doesn't it sound as though DH & VSP were in conflict over the locations of the car at various times during the relevant time period?
http://www.readthehook.com/blog/inde...an-harrington/
Note: Date for this media article is October 30, 2009.
Quote from the above link:
Quote:
Police spokesperson Geller says that although driven by a friend, it was definitely Morgan Harringtons own vehicle. Dr. Harrington has maintained, however, that his daughters 2006 Honda Civic, along with its keys, remained in Harrisonburg until retrieved Sunday by his daughters roommate who drove it back to the family home in Roanoke.
At first, the VSP account, based on a broader base of info & professional expertise, seemed to be more reliable than the account of a possibly very distraught parent; but then the possibility occurred to me that DH may have had some particular evidence that the car actually stayed in Harrisonburg, which might have been embarrassing in some way to the family; for example, if he secretly had placed a tracking device in her car, (but even then, why not tell LE?).
[Why he thought MH's keys remained in H'burg is less clear. ]
BUT now we have this undated quote:
Just to clarify, i don't think anyone lied. I think I assumed. Prior to leaving roanoke, Morgan asked if she could buy gas for her friend to drive. Thus i assumed another car was driven. I did not ask if her car was driven or not, i assumed. It would not have mattered to me whether her car was driven to the concert or not. hope that hhelps. dan
According the above quote, DH really didn't even consider the location of the car (or the keys) very carefully. Morgan's request may have been perhaps accidently misleading. She forgot to mention that she had planned that her car was to be driven from H'burg to C'ville that night; or maybe the guy's car was to be driven, but broke down at the last minute; or some similar incident resulted in MH's car actually being driven that night.
But generally one would expect that the two companions who "borrowed" MH's car that night & drove from C'ville back to H'burg would have offered their apologies & explained the entire situation to DH asap & in extreme detail the very next day.
Also, if DH didn't care much about the whether MH's car were driven from H'burg to C'ville that night, and he had not investigated this question thoroughly, why would he dare to publicly contradict statements being made by the VSP regarding movements of the car?
DH is a psychiatrist by profession; therefore, we might expect that he would be inclined to view the situation scientifically & in detail. Mental health professionals are trained to listen extremely carefully both to what is said & what is
not being said.
Or did the reporter just imply a conflict between DH & VSP when if fact there was none?