Jezbel
Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 420
- Reaction score
- 4
Okay, I am feeling slightly better about things now, when they announced their first question, I was scared they were going in the wrong direction, now that is has been clarified and with the 3rd question about the wording, I think they are trying to find MR guilty. It seems as though they reject the evidence (or lack thereof) of innocence, at least that is something, if the judge said yes it leads to guilt, I think it would have been done.