Hopeful One
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who
I just had a green tea frappacino (no, not strawberry). Not a good idea. I was relaxed, now I'm bouncing off the walls with nerves!!!!!
......I think it's great that the jurors maintain their style....can you imagine if they all started dressing like the Mitigation Specialist all of a sudden...
:drama:
:banghead::banghead::banghead:JA has 55,575 followers on Twitter
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
i know this is not funny.......but this gave me the church giggles:floorlaugh:
hope u get it changed with time to spare![]()
I just had a green tea frappacino (no, not strawberry). Not a good idea. I was relaxed, now I'm bouncing off the walls with nerves!!!!!
Hey, Schube! :seeya:
You and Dr. Horn picked your venue yet?
I just had a green tea frappacino (no, not strawberry). Not a good idea. I was relaxed, now I'm bouncing off the walls with nerves!!!!!
While you wait you should watch Juan's cross on Youtube. And welcome!!!!
i don't get my hackles up about much, but there is a big vein of ageism running through this trial that really PISSES ME OFF!!!!
i'm about your age. i'm tired of anyone implying we don't know about life and new things and technology, and phone sex, and crotch shots, and kinky sex, etc. not ONE of those things is news to me or any other 'old' people i know.
has everyone forgotten the 60's and 70's???? i was 21 in 1970. think i did a few things? MORE than a few? you'd think right if you said 'YES.'
i've not heard one thing in this trial i haven't heard before. i didn't live in a cave all these years, for cryin' out loud.
:banghead:
Just proves how desperate HLN is to keep people watching.
I am curious about the effects of media attention has on jury deliberations.
Specifically I wonder if media attention can be shown to contaminate thoughtful orderly analysis of evidence and testimony.
I suspect that jurors are painfully aware of the notoriety and that their verdict will be highly scrutinized.
Jurors in high profile cases are then interviewed by HLN or 48 Hours and thus reap their own 15 minutes of fame.
My hunch is that intense media attention does indeed warp the ordinary deliberation process. Jurors are transmogrified into analytical machines of the first order as each and every one sniffs out holes in the states case. Forensic evidence normally not even mentioned is found to be in error. Horn failed to mention the dural tear at the entry wound THUS the states entire case is SUSPECT and THUS there is now cause to invoke reasonable doubt.
Media attention paid to crime cases fulfills NO obvious public good. There is really no sincere right for the public to know question when allowing cameras into the courtroom. Why not?
Otherwise the courts should place cameras in every court room and let the public dial through the various cases being adjudicated on any given day. Cities should provide this as an ordinary public service just like cameras often cover City Council debates.
The Arias case is a veritable "train wreck" and its lure is based on prurient interests stemming from the viewing public. Because the Arias case is blood curdling and sensational, it possesses immense entertainment value.
The Arias case is being covered intensely because HLN can parlay viewership ratings into big buck profits. The price the public will pay for HLNs intense scrutiny- or all the HLN After Dark episodes - is another miscarriage of justice and jury verdict error.
No, it's not. There's a lot of people that don't like her that have followed her, as well as a lot of media. Plus some fans. JA would be loving this infamy and that makes me sick.:seeya: No worry ... it's just her 10 followers who opened up thousands of accounts in fake names ...
No worry at all !
:banghead::banghead::banghead:JA has 55,575 followers on Twitter
JA has 55,575 followers on Twitter
Reply With Quote
not for long...