sammie
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 0
Are we really sure about that?
At least to me, that doesn't sound accurate (as much as I would love that to be the case!)
At least in courts I have sat in (sitting on one jury, and observing others) - when the jury sends a question to the Court and he/she can't answer...the judge responds back and says something that amounts to, "you must read the instructions as written and determine the meaning yourself" - meaning they must interpret themselves.
Why would she have to read the modified instructions for impass, and Nurmi object and ask for a mistrial over just clarification of 5 and 6?
I dunno! Just seems odd.............as this whole tweet trial has been!
I agree with you...no reason to issue a modified impasse statement if they didn't say they were in that situation.