Found Deceased WA - Jenise Wright, 6, Bremerton, 2 Aug 2014 - #1 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Other residents in the park described Jenise as outgoing and unafraid to talk to anyone."

" She shared a bedroom with her sister."

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/0...hington-girl-agree-to-take-lie-detector-test/

The whole family must of thought the area was safe. I wonder if they know everyone.. I think neighbors need to start rethinking the day and if anything out of the ordinary took place with another neighbor. Look for scratches, and so forth.Acting odd.. I always mention the above because if a neighbor is lurking it is a good reminder of what they can do to help. If you got a gut feeling, go for it. Call it in.
 
We know that Jenise shared a room with her 12yo sister so assuming S was home then she knows if Jenise went to bed that night. If she went to bed it is unlikely, but not impossible, that someone removed her in the middle of the night. Did mom or dad go to work or anywhere the next morn? Perhaps Jenise snuck in their vehicle wanting to tag along and something happened or idk ... I can't get past the delay in reporting.
 
Police say circumstances in girl’s disappearance ‘suspicious’
Posted: 7:52 a.m. Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2014
Authorities aren't calling the girl’s disappearance an abduction, but are looking at all possibilities. A spokesman for the Kitsap County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Scott Wilson, says the circumstances are suspicious.
Investigators with the state crime lab took pictures inside the home and collected evidence.

http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/police-say-circumstances-girls-disappearance-suspi/ngt8K/
 
Can anyone offer suggestions as to why it would take the police 39 minutes to respond to a missing 6 year-old 911 call?

Maybe because a child made it and they didn't take it as seriously as if an adult had? **speculative**

I read upstream that a ' neighbor' also called 911 . Is that true? Link , please if anyone has it. TIA
 
Maybe because a child made it and they didn't take it as seriously as if an adult had? **speculative**

I read upstream that a ' neighbor' also called 911 . Is that true? Link , please if anyone has it. TIA

According to one of the first videos, the reporter stated that he called LE and verified that the first call about Jenise being missing came in at 9:55pm. It's linked within the first 50 or so posts.

ETA: So for clarity, no - no one else called to report Jenise missing. First call was at 9:55pm.
 
News reports say the parents willingly took polygraphs- and they allowed the home to be searched without a warrant. .

I wonder how the father made out on the polygraph. So far, there are three stories of when the parents first started looking for the child: one story was that they first started looking when she was not home for dinner at 8:30pm; another said noon; and the third story was in the news clip, when the father was shown the poster and questioned about waiting 24 hrs to report her missing, he said "that's how long we've been looking for her".

http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/6-year-old-girl-missing-bremerton/ngtWG/
 
I assume the answer to this is no since it was a Sunday but is there any chance that garbage was picked up in the 24 hours before the report?

<modsnip> I assume it likely draws a bit of traffic and likely provides an opportunity for strangers to be in the area unquestioned.
 
I just want to add one thing....as much as we sleuths want more info NOW...I think FBI is being cautious which is good. They are pulling all stops. Neighborhood is hunkered down.
 
I wonder how the father made out on the polygraph. So far, there are three stories of when the parents first started looking for the child: one story was that they first started looking when she was not home for dinner at 8:30pm; another said noon; and the third story was in the news clip, when the father was shown the poster and questioned about waiting 24 hrs to report her missing, he said "that's how long we've been looking for her".

Presuming the parents innocent, the scenario could be:
Noon: Where's J? Hey, Big Sister, go look for her.
Then the family proceeds with their day, not particularly worried but noticing she's gone.

Dinnertime: You never found her? We'd better look around ourselves.
Walk around the neighborhood, asking neighbors if they've seen her. They still think she's wandered off but not necessarily in danger. As the sun starts to set with no idea where J is, but in denial that something bad happened, they decide authorities should be called.

WHY a child placed that call baffles me, and the only reasonable explanation I can come up with is that they STILL assumed the child would show up after a day of fun romping around. But, they called LE "just in case" J really was abducted or injured somewhere.

I just have a feeling, based on the father, that they really expected her to show up at any minute and he sort of thought calling 911 was unnecessarily panicky. (I don't agree with him, but that's the vibe I get from him. He is not a "helicopter parent.")

I'm on the fence about them, though leaning toward thinking they were neglectful but not involved with harming their child. I reserve the right to change my mind.

FWIW, I also had a childhood (1970s) where we were free to roam around all day and didn't check in until we were hungry. We did however, all run home when the 9pm whistle in our town blew. That was everyone's curfew. It was a childhood spent mostly outdoors, in all kinds of weather. Looking back, I have great memories of that freedom, but am also sort of amazed at it. Child-rearing norms have changed a lot since then. I didn't give my own children the same freedom my parents gave me.
 
RE: A child making the 911 call

Didn't one of Isabel Celis' brothers make her 911 call as well?
 
Presuming the parents innocent, the scenario could be:
Noon: Where's J? Hey, Big Sister, go look for her.
Then the family proceeds with their day, not particularly worried but noticing she's gone.

Dinnertime: You never found her? We'd better look around ourselves.
Walk around the neighborhood, asking neighbors if they've seen her. They still think she's wandered off but not necessarily in danger. As the sun starts to set with no idea where J is, but in denial that something bad happened, they decide authorities should be called.

WHY a child placed that call baffles me, and the only reasonable explanation I can come up with is that they STILL assumed the child would show up after a day of fun romping around. But, they called LE "just in case" J really was abducted or injured somewhere.

I just have a feeling, based on the father, that they really expected her to show up at any minute and he sort of thought calling 911 was unnecessarily panicky. (I don't agree with him, but that's the vibe I get from him. He is not a "helicopter parent.")

I'm on the fence about them, though leaning toward thinking they were neglectful but not involved with harming their child. I reserve the right to change my mind.

FWIW, I also had a childhood (1970s) where we were free to roam around all day and didn't check in until we were hungry. We did however, all run home when the 9pm whistle in our town blew. That was everyone's curfew. It was a childhood spent mostly outdoors, in all kinds of weather. Looking back, I have great memories of that freedom, but am also sort of amazed at it. Child-rearing norms have changed a lot since then. I didn't give my own children the same freedom my parents gave me.
Did you have that kind of freedom at 6 years old? I keep coming back to her age -- 6 years old! I cannot imagine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
170
Total visitors
240

Forum statistics

Threads
609,330
Messages
18,252,742
Members
234,626
Latest member
XtraGuacPlz
Back
Top