KivaSupporter
Inactive
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 985
- Reaction score
- 14
Yes it is. I wonder how the Daily Mail found out about the threat to spank her then 8 year old? Where does that detail come from?
It comes from court records. See above.
Yes it is. I wonder how the Daily Mail found out about the threat to spank her then 8 year old? Where does that detail come from?
They weren't always accurate in the Alanna Gallagher case. And just as in this one, true to form, they played up every titillating morsel of salacious gossip they could manage to dig up -- none of which, mind you, had anything to do with Alanna's tragic fate. But they do publish nice photographs.Well, the daily mail is notorious for its reporting . Infamous might be a better word. Given that's a uk outlet and no US outlet has picked up on that, I'd wonder if it's accurate. . . . while praying that it's not.
Schmae + TOS = Ban , bbs
"Wright's attorney argued..." The lie that a family member urged the child to tell could've been that Wright was innocent -- would coincide w/the threat of a spanking if she mentioned again (defense attorneys are notorious for twisting the truth, yes?).
do we know if the mobile home has 1, 2 or 3 bedrooms?
And what the public? Do we bear no responsibility to the "earlier victim"?
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/...year-old-girl-enters-third-day-270160141.html
According to court documents, James Wright was charged with first-degree child molestation in February 2000 for molesting the 8-year-old girl following a New Year's Eve celebration. The girl told a detective and social worker that he inappropriately touched her.
More than a year later, in June 2001, the charges were amended to include third-degree child molestation after a 15-year-old girl who was babysitting the girl during New Year's Eve 2000 said that Wright touched her breasts and put his hands down her pants, according to court documents.
I'm totally down with the last sentence.I don't know the answer to that. What are we to do? It's out there and we can't unsee it. We, here, can agree to ignore it and edit out every mention of it but others won't be as kind. I think the best we can do is what we do best, we show kindness and compassion while focusing on getting Jenise home.
How many RSO's live in their area? I read that LE interviewed neighbors and RSO's in the area. So I am just curious WHY any parent would allow their child to wander around ALONE in a neighborhood that may even have ONE RSO?
Authorities are also working to contact sex offenders, but ones who are listed as transients are difficult to find.
http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/pol...-6-year-old-was-abducted/ngwkp/?__federated=1
Dear lord!
Precious little girl....with parents who are so busy doing, "what" that they can't be bothered to care for her? I wonder how many little ones are like Jenise? Wandering around, relying on neighbors for food, drink, shelter? The excuse of "free roaming", independent....riiiiiight....it's neighbors like me and many others who look after your kids! Who worry about them, feed them.....
As for dad....after I read what he had been charged with and pled guilty to...I quit reading. The fact that he was allowed to plea down or whatever and he's free to roam around other kids. Too angry for words....
How does a woman, a mother with 4 daughters, stay married to a man like that? She gave birth to 3 children with that man after this happened. God help those sweet children because their parents never did.
Mother seems to be taking a very low profile....where was she when J was wandering the streets?? She is the MOTHER. It's hard be me to stay civil.
I had a similar thought when I posted earlier that I think she's still right there in the park. Getting under skirting is very easy & a great place for kids to play (even if they're told not to). Not to mention the various storage sheds located throughout the park.
Well, the daily mail is notorious for its reporting . Infamous might be a better word. Given that's a uk outlet and no US outlet has picked up on that, I'd wonder if it's accurate. . . . while praying that it's not.
Schmae + TOS = Ban , bbs
I have a feeling that this case is going to end badly and it's so sad to me. This little girl is absolutely beautiful. For anyone who is wondering Jane and Nancy are covering this tonight. Jane is talking about it right now.
And I'm sorry but Law Enforcement are failing this little girl! I am absolutely in shock that they are saying the earlier molestation accusations are irrelevant! Are you kidding me? Wow....SMH
Plus, the only one in this scenario who deserves shame is James Wright (well, and any other adults who enabled him). I will stop discussing his past if that's required here, but I hope to god that at least the FBI are keeping it in mind while investigating Jenise's disappearance.I don't know the answer to that. What are we to do? It's out there and we can't unsee it. We, here, can agree to ignore it and edit out every mention of it but others won't be as kind. I think the best we can do is what we do best, we show kindness and compassion while focusing on getting Jenise home.
Is that a direct quote from LE that the earlier charges are irrelevant? Do you have a link?
If that is a direct quote, perhaps it indicates the polygraph went well and searches of the home have provided no evidence of guilt thus far?
daily mall is not considered msm, per tos, iirc? How's that for a buncha acronyms?