ChuckMaureen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,847
- Reaction score
- 13,038
Copied over last section of ChuckM's post from last evening....
/// snippage ///
If KK were involved what would be a motivating factor? Money via Human Trafficking? Revenge? Fodder for a book? I suspect that is highly unlikely.
[Novice Seeker's response to my post begins here:]
Motivating factor for what? KK being the one who hurt Lindsey for the reasons posted above? My reference to the conflicting statements of KK and boyfriend is to the question of why does something as simple as who told who to go home be so complicated. [1.] When a crime is committed and LE interviews the last known adults to see this child alive why can't the truth be told, period. Has society altered the definition of truth enough that people can be allowed to justify or define their own meaning of what truth is?
Quote:
I just don't buy the stranger abduction b/c in a town that small s/he would have stuck out like a sore thumb. It's my opinion that whoever took Lindsey is very familiar with that community. Although I fear Lindsey is no longer with us I do think her precious body is nearby. [end quote]
[Novice Seeker's response to my post continues here:]
Yes, I believe this crime was committed by someone locally. Although I'm not sure where the crime actually took place. There are numerous sources or sites that have information about this crime. [2.] Some may be setting "fires and chasing their own smoke" but we're all intelligent enough to recognize the difference between what just looks like a fire and that which is a real fire.
[3.] How does one go about searching for clues, information and the truth about the unanswered questions and lies made by those close to this case?
Novice Seeker
Hi, NS,
Thank you for your comments!
Regarding the phrases I bolded, enlarged and numbered, above:
- Are you indicating someone lied during when they were interviewed by LE? Based upon ... ?
- What are the 'real' fires in this case?
- When someone does not know the specific answer to a specific question and has asked someone to provide the answer, it seems to me the person asking the question is in no position to claim the answer to be a lie [without having validated facts to back up the claim].
We might suspect they are lies, but by assuming they are lies does not further the case, it simply blurs the focus. Hence, my smoke reference.
NS, the points you make are relevant. The multitude of posts providing variations on a theme are staggering. When the fact field becomes so cluttered with debris that nothing but frustration and confusuion is realized, it is time to step back and sweep away the debris:
- Parse down to a specific check item list.
- Ask questions directly to the principals involved with each item.
- Ask questions directly to LE to gain more knowledge, if possible beyond that which already was made public.
- Weigh all gathered information.
- State your case.