What do you think of this? Valid or someone trying too hard to sway to IDI? https://www.reddit.com/r/JonBenet/comments/56396e/confused_about_the_gj/
Feel free to delete if I'm breaking rules.
IMO I agree with you about the wording. But it's not so much the wording of the true bills. it's the fact the GJ found enough evidence to admit the four charges.
As the public, we have only seen a small portion of evidence.
I think they started from the supposition that it was IDI and fit all the evidence in to that theory. If you look on the sidebar it says "This is NOT an RDI sub"...so that kind of says it all.