I think it is really unusual to have a judge-only murder trial here in Ontario. I think they happen more out west for some reason. I feel like DM would for sure be convicted if this had been a jury trial, but I am fearful on the outcome, since this is a judge-only trial. Judges base their judgements on only facts and only what is allowed.. whereas public members of the jury are not professionals, just peers. Seems this is a very circumstantial case, and there were errors made in the beginning. I hope there is justice for poor WM. But I guess even if there ends up not being justice, at least DM is put away already for some 50 years.. so.. if this had happened only a few years earlier, he'd only be looking at a max of 25, even if convicted of all 3 murders. jmo.Apologies if this has been answered already, I’m a few pages behind. Recently there was a trial by Judge in my province (triple murder/Klaus and Frank) and although there were no opening statements, both the prosecution and defence gave closing remarks including their respective theories. I don’t know if that’s the norm though.
One other thing...unlike jury trials, the judge doesn’t release the verdict immediately following the trial. In the case above, the guilty verdict was announced about a month and a half later.
Edited to specify 'judge-only *murder* trial'