weekend discussion: discuss the trial here #139

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Especially after today, its seems pretty obvious that the DT and JA have lost, and the worst has yet to come (JM's rebuttal and closing). So, the pundits are left sounding more and more idiotic and distasteful with each of the remaining few days of trial.

HLN is particularly disgusting.. has turned this trial into a catheter commercial with a few minutes for trial breaks here and there... ugh.

Part and parcel why I refuse to watch it. After the jury questions left NO doubt what side they are on, the TH will STILL throw the State under the bus. It's like a Benny Hill sketch.

I wonder who has been the bigger liability for the DT- Samuels or ALV?
 
- Gives shout outs to her buddies in court

- Makes smarty pants, patronizing comments to the prosecutor ("Are you angry with me, Mr. Martinez?) and admonishes the prosecutor ("If you were in my group, Mr. Martinez, I'd put you in a Time-Out.

- Stalling, stalling, stalling by pretending she doesn't understand the prosecutor's questions and insisting on providing folksy and annoying anecdotal details then suddenly capable of giving succinct and even monosyllabic answers to the defense attorney.

She was really convinced she was going to ride in and save the day for the defense team but ended up limping off the stand and needing assistance herself.

I think she was convinced. I know a lot of people feel that she's in this for the money alone, and, yeah, I think that is part of it, but there is no way someone who didn't actually believe what they are saying could be as obstinate and recalcitrant as she was on the stand.
It kind of goes back to what I just posted about flexibility. No matter what opinion you are going to deliver on the stand or how much you believe in it, most people have the ability to imagine how certain aspects of the evidence could be perceived by other people. A good expert would do this often, to anticipate potential problems.
She not only failed at this, but when others went ahead and did it for her (in the form of jury questions) she couldn't explain her position in the terms set out by the question.
So, yeah, I think she was convinced because imagining alternative perspectives seem to be a problem for her.
 
That woman needs to have a fact checker with her all times she is going to speak on any case whatsoever.

Yes! Thank you!

She was on one of the shows earlier and said that Jodi couldn't have doctored her journals because she was arrested a week after the killing. I was like, wait...what?

I was hoping Beth Karas would correct her, but she's too classy for that.
 
Ive been in many "relationships", been married, and most recently escaped from an abusive 2 year mistake...but I honestly dont remember ever being on a 'real date'--you know, where a guy actually asks you out, plans a date, picks you up, takes you out, walks you to the door...
It must be my generation (Im 42); friends my age agree...real "old fashioned" dating seems to have skipped us :(
Sorry for OT... chivalry is dead.

That was the date I had! Actually someone I met online....flew other here and he stayed in a motel for a week...a week of dates like that! Unfortunately.....after he flew back he decided to pursue other options. Probably the best week of my life....normal dates with a normal guy.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
 
Yes! Thank you!

She was on one of the shows earlier and said that Jodi couldn't have doctored her journals because she was arrested a week after the killing. I was like, wait...what?

I was hoping Beth Karas would correct her, but she's too classy for that.

I don't know why anyone has her on any show ever, I used to listen to her on Levi Page and just laugh, names wrong, dates wrong, injuries wrong .. I can't remember the details now, but it was a JOKE. I can't believe HLN are paying her to appear!!
 
Does anyone know where I can find JM's questioning ALV this afternoon, I missed it?
 
Bringing over from other thread 'cos the door slammed on me and broke my finger. :facepalm:

...


Thank you, as always, AZlawyer.

I have been off line since the end of court today. Has anyone posted the possibility that the same juror that asked LaViolette why she continually looked over and smiled at the defendant may have sent a note to the judge last week that LaViolette was being coached from the defence table?

I wondered if the two hour session in chambers the other day, with LaViolette present, was while the judge went through the camera footage, and now Tuesday is a hearing on Wilmott's behaviour.

Just a thought.

Did JW seem upset, though?
 
I agree with you and hope she gets LWOP...I feel a bit different then you do, I think the DP should be for someone that murders 2 or more people, mass murderers and serial killers.

Plus after all the appeals of the DP that JA will apply for it will cost more money than if they would have just given her LWOP in the first place. MOO and all that.

BBM...Bothers me too:cry::nerves:

...hmmmm... I think that the brutality of the crime and torture of the victim should be considered, as well as premeditation and lack of remorse .....
And certain murderers should be confined outside the general population based on the atrocity of their crimes...I could go on, but.....
 
- brings her own cheerleaders.

forgets to turn her cell phone off - too old fashioned to know how it works
she said that the gun went off in the closet - oops
she said the knife was on the bedside table - oops
she claimed to have testified for one or two men in criminal trials - LIAR

There are sooooo many. It's like shootin' Jodi in a barrel.
 
Then, she started to say something snarky about Juan, but she caught herself and finished her sentence by saying "but most of our viewers think he hung the moon"......and we do!

I saw that! :floorlaugh: She did not want to whip all of the Juannettes into a frenzy.

And of course Juan hung the moon! Det Flores held the ladder. :heartluv::heartluv:
 
Part and parcel why I refuse to watch it. After the jury questions left NO doubt what side they are on, the TH will STILL throw the State under the bus. It's like a Benny Hill sketch.

I wonder who has been the bigger liability for the DT- Samuels or ALV?


IMO

Biggest liability = Jodi
 
ALV looked over at the jury then said what appears to be the word "jerk".

If indeed that is what she said while looking at the jury, that is highly improper and there should be some sort of repercussion.
 
Near the end of Alyce's testimony today she said that she believed she got the "Jodi shooting in the closet" info from Dr Samuels...is this a no-no? Is she allowed to be privy to someone else's testimony, and then use is as her own while she's on the stand?

Yes, as an expert it would be normal and appropriate for her to read and rely on another expert's report.
 
If I just did the dishes after my SO said 'are you going to do something or what' am I abused after sitting on the couch for 4 hours straight or does he have a point?

ALV: Abused.

GENPOP: Get off your lazy *advertiser censored***!!

Geez! It wasn't like your normal six hours...so what the heck!...definite abuse....your SO needs to go to a men's group for a time out....such abuse!:what:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
235
Total visitors
366

Forum statistics

Threads
609,338
Messages
18,252,837
Members
234,628
Latest member
BillK9
Back
Top