RR0004
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 19,987
- Reaction score
- -26
Cecy...do you have a link to that convo between KB and JB? This is the first I'm hearing about it. TIALOL - glad nobody said squirrel!
btw - love your siggy!
Cecy...do you have a link to that convo between KB and JB? This is the first I'm hearing about it. TIALOL - glad nobody said squirrel!
btw - love your siggy!
...and wound up in China for a year long 'speaking engagement'. Oops! Sorry- that was after the misplaced evidence in the Spector case- several years ago. My Bad!:laugh::laugh: Whenever I see Dr Lee's name from now I shall call him 'the Man who went out to lunch'....
Tony says that Strickland talked to both the defense and State before canceling the trial next week, a good sign that a plea deal is in the works - but she could change her mind before then...
If she knows what's good for her, she won't change her mind. I really DID want to see that trial though, it could have revealed things that we don't know of yet.
And I was planning on calling into work sick for that! I'm saving vacation time for murder trial... please let it be on tru tv!
I like this part:
"A hearing in Caseys check fraud case is expected to be held Monday afternoon. That's where Casey will likely plead."
That's gonna be a CROWDED hearing next Monday, methinks.
For a good idea on how this will actually play out in court next Monday, read Hornsby's blog post from Dec 10:
http://blog.richardhornsby.com/2009/12/casey-anthony-insufficient-funds-part-deux/
The parts about Plea to the Bench and Strateregy seem especially relevant.
RR0004 I agree that this is part of a bigger picture. Remember that the defense must give their witness list and proof that Caylee was placed after KC was in jail by beginning February. Rhornsby has given us good insight into WHY they can't do that. The SA has been professional AND determined in their defense of Caylee and they gave JB & Co plenty of rope to hang themselves with extending a loooong time period to give their witness list and proof that Caylee was placed after KC was in jail. Their time is up! It seems the defense is backed into a corner and pleading both cases out is the only option left. Of course, they aren't reasonable and may try to get more TV time but I can't see the SA agreeing to extending this sad case any longer. Also, I love this website and all the regular and part-time posters who really do a great job of sleuthing every new twist and turn and their compassion for the only one who counts, Caylee. I rarely post but this is BIG and I wanted to add my :twocents:. One last thing, does anyone remember LDB saying at the end of one of the motion hearings, I think about COV, that she could present her CIC in 1 1/2 hours? If I'm remembering correctly, that would mean she could persuade a jury that KC is guilty in less than two hours. I've tried to find it but haven't been successful. Like everyone else, I'll be tuned in tomorrow afternoon to see how this plays out. Gogranny and MOOSee the emotional side of me wants this to be part of a bigger deal...but it may just simply be the end to this.
I just finished "Angel of Death Row" your first paragraph is DEAD on to what she says in her book. The book is a compilation of several cases she has worked on. A lot of the cases she didn't start from the beginning but rather swooped in during the sentencing phase. She states in her book that she doesn't even ASK if they did it. If something comes out during interviews then fine but sometimes she would rather NOT be in the know.
It's an interesting read and I thank my public library for being on the ball and having it so fast!
ETA..IMO there is no way we will see a plea deal in the murder trial..not with JB and certainly not with AL. I will eat my hat if this happens.
A lot of the cases she didn't start from the beginning but rather swooped in during the sentencing phase. She states in her book that she doesn't even ASK if they did it. If something comes out during interviews then fine but sometimes she would rather NOT be in the know.
I haven't been a fan of AL, but reading this just created a real hatred for her. She doesn't care if people are guilty or innocent. She doesn't care one bit if someone gets a fair trial. She doesn't care about truth, justice or integrity. I could understand her taking on this case and others she did if she truly felt the evidence didn't support the dp. But it's not about that. It's all about HER. It's all about getting her 15 minutes of fame and and another notch on her belt. She should be disgusted with herself. I know I am.
I haven't been a fan of AL, but reading this just created a real hatred for her. She doesn't care if people are guilty or innocent. She doesn't care one bit if someone gets a fair trial. She doesn't care about truth, justice or integrity. I could understand her taking on this case and others she did if she truly felt the evidence didn't support the dp. But it's not about that. It's all about HER. It's all about getting her 15 minutes of fame and and another notch on her belt. She should be disgusted with herself. I know I am.
ITA ... Lyon has proven that with her history, that's for sure ... IMO SHE was the one that sought this case and not the defense who contacted her ... was it because she saw the injustice in the case? Or was it she saw an opportunity to get on her soap box in a very high profile case and further her cause? Or was it simply for more exposure, publicity and to promote her book? I say it's the latter ...