Horace Finklestein
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,658
- Reaction score
- 1
Excuse my sideways train of thought, but I am a tad bewildered so I'll see if anyone can help me out.
For the purpose I am assuming that the complaint is regarding knowledge of the remains location.
Okay so Baez knows and tells DC, DC is off to search the location, Baez is aware of his actions (possibly even requested them) since he advises against calling LE.
So - WHY bother searching the location? If there is no intention to report, what is the point of the visit at all?
Oh, and since it was a full month later until the discovery of the remains occurred, could the reason for the 'don't report' instruction be to allow further degradation of evidence?
KC was already indicted on 1st degree murder charges before the remaiins were found and prior to the DC search of the area ------- sooooo, would knowledge of the remains location become part of the 'discovery' process, or maybe concealing evidence, or even obstruction of justice?
If Baez is requesting LE follow up leads of a live Caylee, whilst knowing she is already dead be perpetuating a known lie?
I much prefer the simpler - KC declaring her innocence on the affidavit and Baez submitting it whilst knowing it to be false.
My question exactly. Seriously, what in the world is wrong with our society if the defense can find a body and not report it? That is disgusting on so many levels.