TopTop
Active Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2009
- Messages
- 966
- Reaction score
- 45
WHY would we compare Desiree to Terri?
Desiree is not an un-named person of interest in the disappearance of a child and a woman who has attempted to have her husband murdered. Desiree is up front, real, INNOCENT. She is a mother pleading with the woman who disappeared her child and the woman is not responding.
Tit for tat is childish. There is nothing to compare with these two women.
My opinion.
I am not comparing one to the other nor the positions they are in. I am just trying to point out that people are focusing on things where Terri is concerned that do not point to her guilt. I am convinced that she is in some way involved in Kyron's disappearance. If not directly she defintely knows a lot more information than she is giving.
The fact that she is looking better, younger etc does not in my opinion point to her guilt at all. I used DY as an example to show that appearance is obviously not an indication of guilt.