Do LE have regular psych evaluations as part of their ongoing employment? I ask because I've always found it strange a man would leave a respected LE profession on the urging of his wife to flounder in low paying jobs. He was in LE when they married right? And it was the birth of Lee that prompted CA to encourage him to morph into something else? Or was it.
... [snip]
I wonder if there were issues at work that combined with his wife's nattering in the background, forced his hand to quit. Some mental health issue, anger management, who knows but if the story about shoving his father through a window is true, GA has a problem. [snip]
In any case, GA didn't do it. An ex-LE wouldn't leave a corpse within smelling distance of his house IMO. He wouldn't have volunteered to drive the car home from the impound or questioned at the time, the horrible smell emanating from the trunk. So I have to ask, what will the defense try to blame on GA exactly?
GA is the only one in the family except the Plesea's that I have even an iota of sympathy for. He's the only one that has normal emotional reactions visible on ghis face and he's the only one IMHO that the jury will be able to relate to human to human.
JMO
I agree with your insights concerning George. It seems as if he is the most real and the most heartfelt, yet there is something strange that is hidden in the back story concerning his exit from LE, imo.
I used to post quite a bit on another board about this case. There was one man there who believed Casey was innocent. When we urged him to convince us by giving us a believable scenario it used to come down to George as being the only option. He could explain away three main problems for Casey by using George as a suspect.
Why did she make up the Nanny story? To cover for her Father.
Why didn't she report the child missing? Because at first she thought he wouldn't hurt her, and then she was frightened and was also covering for
him. And she was a sexual abuse victim of his for decades.
Why doesn't she cooperate with LE ? Because she does not want to get her Father in trouble so she is just going to sit and do nothing and wait because she knows she is innocent so she will be set free eventually.
How did the killer know about the pet dumping ground from her childhood and how did they get the child's toys and blankets?
Obviously George could do all of that. Another reason he is a good option for a suspect.
Why did the canine patrol alert on the Anthony's yard? Because George initially buried the baby there and then hid her later on. And the car with the DNA in the trunk is his car and he had access to it himself.
So according to this Casey supporter I knew, a very adamant one, George was the most likely culprit. He provides logical reasons for Casey's lies and excuses and serves to make Casey the victim.
I don't think the defense will have any success with this theory at all. But I think that might be why Casey wrote those accusations in her jail house letters. She was looking to set George up. I worry that one lone juror could buy this nonsense though.