What questions are still unanswered?

[Pensfan]

Casey told Amy that she could move in and her parents were moving out. George and Cindy were not planning to move out though. What was Casey going to do to make George and Cindy "go away"?

 

[Pensfan]

Here is another scary unanswered question:

NINE dead pets in twenty years?

 

[cluciano63]

Not sure if this has been answered on this thread or not, but the diary was manufactured in 2004, so yes it was backdated to 2003.

What do you mean by backdated? I thought the entry did not have a year, just the month and day?

 

[gngr~snap]

Wow! I never knew that! I thought it was odd that she would give such a broad time reference for when she dropped off her child- 4 hours, and you can't recall exactly when? Most people have set schedules for when they drop off their children at daycare, not a 4 hour window, and 4 hours to get to your job??? What kind of job has that kind of flexibility???

She told where Caylee was in her initial police report
No one could decipher it.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6920954#post6920954"]What questions are still unanswered? - Page 18 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

, June 9, 2008, between 9am and 1pm, I took Caylee to the Sawgrass apartments, located on Conway Rd. Caylee's nanny Zenaida Fernandes-Gonzalez has watched her for the past year and a half, to two years. Zenaida is twenty-five years old, and is from New York. She is roughly 5 foot 7 inches tall, 140 pounds. She has dark brown, curly hair, and brown eyes. Zenaida's birthday is in September. I met Zenaida

 

[JennaB]

Please remind me what did the computer forensics reveal about the laptop computer? Or were they unable to obtain anything because at one point I heard it crashed and was blue screened. Just wondering what I missed in the testimony. Thanks.

Tony Lazarro said on during a posting session on another message board that the Compaq laptop which was really Cindy's did crash and bring up a blue screen. He said that on July 15th, that Lee went to his apartment to get some of Casey's things. I can't remember exactly who but Tony or Lee opened the laptop and turned it on and blue screen appeared.

 

[gngr~snap]

Here is another scary unanswered question:

NINE dead pets in twenty years?

I am sitting on my hands here!:silenced:
cause I think this is gonna get really :runaway:
really bad soon.

All I can Do is wait.

 

[crucibelle]

6/16/08 her dad calls her at 3:04 p.m. (26 secs),

http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2011/0224/26984466.pdf

Thank you so much for that link! I've been looking for that chat conversation that starts at 7:56 in the morning... and there it is. About that 3 PM phone call, I'm not sure if it was on this thread or not -- but someone was saying that phone call was made to KC's cell. There is a post on this forum somewhere, it's either by BondJamesBond, or JWG, that says that call was made by George to the Anthony home... not KC's cell. So, George was either checking up on her to see if she had went back home (hence, not working) or he knew she was there (as in, she never left while he was there). JMO.

 

[LinasK]

What do you mean by backdated? I thought the entry did not have a year, just the month and day?

On the Left Hand corner was handwritten "'03" in red ink. Wasn't proven if it was Casey handwriting or Cindy's...

 

[cluciano63]

On the Left Hand corner was handwritten "'03" in red ink. Wasn't proven if it was Casey handwriting or Cindy's...

No one really knows if she had the diary with her, do they?
I could almost see Cindy filling in the year later, in a panic...
but why choose 03? I thought what was written could almost apply to the period of June 05 when Casey finally admitted she was pregnant.

 

[Whisperer]

I want to know why it is so important that not one person will say who the father of Caylee is. That is a very BIG secret to keep. Sean D. was on TV and said he was FCA's best friend. She told him to sit down and had something to tell him. She then announced her pregnancy. According to him he never asked who the father is. Strange? Mucho Strange indeed!! Can anyone fill me in because I have never seen friends and people at the age of 19 not inquiring WTH is the father?

All the family...they didn't ask. All the friends....they didn't ask. These people all lie, every last one of them. They should all pick up and move to Satsuma..

 

[Whisperer]

Wow...I think you might be on to something. I mean..what are the odds that both died in car accidents within four days?! She looked at a couple papers in one internet session and it had the weeks' deaths! This girl gets more twisted all the time, huh?!

What about the girl found in Blanchard Park? FKC used to say CA would tell her not to go there because of the young girl found dead...which, come think of it used to resemble Zanny..I haven't thought about that in years.

Was the murder ever solved. I think the girl was from NJ/NY.

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/16573208/detail.html

 

[crucibelle]

Oops!! I found the post I was referencing in my earlier comment, and I was mistaken. There was a call to KC's cellphone from George AND a call to the Anthony home. The call to the Anthony home was made before the call to KC's cellphone. Here's the post I was talking about by BondJamesBond:

[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3634902&postcount=128"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2008.06.09 vs 2008.06.16 Why the Discrepancy?[/ame]

ON 6/16, whether George later recalled it or not, George KNEW Casey was @ G&C's Hopespring house with Caylee when he left for work ~2:30PM, as evidenced by his call to the house @ ~3:03PM just prior to his call to Casey's cell @ ~3:04PM.

 

[Whisperer]

There was decomp in the car. The stain had been scrubbed. I suspect gasoline was poured on in at times to keep the smell down. Then dry cleaning fluid perhaps..but the stain was worked over.

I think I just read that there was no decomp in the trunk. I beg to differ. The smell is most likely stil in the cans...and it was from the carpet.

Maggots there were at least four generations old...too late for getting DNA from them.

 

[logicalgirl]

I want to know why it is so important that not one person will say who the father of Caylee is. That is a very BIG secret to keep. Sean D. was on TV and said he was FCA's best friend. She told him to sit down and had something to tell him. She then announced her pregnancy. According to him he never asked who the father is. Strange? Mucho Strange indeed!! Can anyone fill me in because I have never seen friends and people at the age of 19 not inquiring WTH is the father?

All the family...they didn't ask. All the friends....they didn't ask. These people all lie, every last one of them. They should all pick up and move to Satsuma..

There you see Whisperer, you are obviously a nicer person than I am.

For me, three answers to that question are possible. The first is that they did ask - but don't want to admit to being the person who ask that question.

OR CFCA provided them with that answer - that is she said I have no idea who the father is because I've been a naughty naughty girl.

OR they already knew CFCA was a habitual liar and wouldn't tell them the truth anyhow. Hadn't her friends already been aware she accused one friend of getting her pregnant that resulted in a miscarriage?

 

[logicalgirl]

Oops!! I found the post I was referencing in my earlier comment, and I was mistaken. There was a call to KC's cellphone from George AND a call to the Anthony home. The call to the Anthony home was made before the call to KC's cellphone. Here's the post I was talking about by BondJamesBond:

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2008.06.09 vs 2008.06.16 Why the Discrepancy?

Thanks for looking that up Crucibelle - I just didn't have the heart to go over it again.

I don't understand why we are overlooking the obvious - CA had just found out CFCA had been pilfering from her grandfather's account. Why wouldn't George want to talk to her about that out of the range of her temper tantrums and her mother's ears?

I relistened to the jail video where CFCA is telling her parents how angry she is and then really loses her temper while they sit there quietly being concerned that she is angry. If that was my child and she was telling me about her anger about sitting in jail when my grand daughter was missing - I know for sure my response would NOT be about "concern for her anger level" at all! She and I would have had quite a different discussion!

 

[cluciano63]

I find it more than strange that Casey never told anyone who the father is/was. I don't think it is because she doesn't know; there is a relatively small window to get pregnant, and I doubt there were dozens of men within a period of a few weeks. Maybe more than one, but still, she probably had a pretty good idea, she was 19 at the time and possibly not quite as "active" as she was a few years later. My best guess is that it was a one-night stand with someone who she could not track down, even if she wanted to. That is the only explanation that makes sense to me. I don't believe he is dead. JMO

 

[Cross Creek]

Did the juror who was asking 5 figures for his interview get it?

 

[Kyle323]

I disagree, and I'm pretty shocked by your statement about the jury.
The jury had no choice. The FBI crime lab had put everything about Casey under the microscope and the evidence did not connect Casey Anthony to the crime. There were fibers, there was DNA, none of it from Casey. None of the fiber, DNA, hair, nothing at the scene was from Casey. The soil in Casey's trunk was not a match to the scene. The residues and soils on Casey's clothing and shoes were not a match to the scene.

And all the cornerstones of the state's case were refuted by testimony. The state maintained that decomposition had begun in Casey's car trunk on June 16 or thereabouts, yet all the witnesses testified that there was no smell from June 16 to June 30. There was the partial DNA on the duct tape on Caylee's skull that was from SOMEONE ELSE. (One of the lab workers and the neighbor BB were not excluded, and the jury must have wondered why the state didn't compare it to anyone else in the case. Likewise with the Q107 hair, not from Casey or Caylee, or from the crime scene investigators, and state lost interest and did not compare it to others.) The jury must have been wondering about the fibers. Obviously there wasn't any match to Casey or her car or home or the state would have mentioned it. (We knew as much from discovery.)

The state maintained the murder date must have been June 16, and no witnesses had seen Caylee after that date, yet the jury saw from testimony that Casey wasn't alone on that day....the jury had to wonder why only Casey's clothes and shoes were all sent to the FBI, why no fiber studies elsewhere etc.LOL. The state claimed right up til closing argument that only Casey had access to the items found with Caylee but that obviously was not true. (Even if the jury didn't know about the Winnie blanket being in photos at the Glenwood townhome earlier in 2008 for example, they did know from testimony that Casey wasn't the only person who had been at the A home. They may have known about the Globe photos showing the T-shirt at the townhome, I don't remember if this was spelled out for them. They did hear Cindy say she hadn't seen the shorts for months, and the Winnie blanket since May.

And, the state maintained it was human adipocere on the napkins with the pizza box in the trash, (the focus of the maggots), yet, the jury saw that the state never investigated the source of the napkins, the apartment, which didn't make much sense. Not to mention that the state didn't send the napkins to the FBI to determine if the substance was in fact adipocere. LOL.

And, the state maintained that Casey used chloroform on Caylee, yet the jury saw that it was Casey's ex-boyfriend who had a joke about chloroform on his myspace....not Casey. No evidence was presented that Casey had ever obtained or made or had chloroform, or that there was ever chloroform in the A home. And, the state showed no interest in the bottle/syringe with traces of chloroform which were found in the Disney bag 6 inches from Caylee's skull (because of the fact the bottle/syringe also had traces of testosterone? or because the Q107 hair was from someone else and might have been with these items?) The state just dropped this evidence.

The "mountain of evidence" against Casey that the state kept claiming they had just didn't exist. It wasn't there. There wasn't even any evidence of human adipocere in the car trunk from the FBI, for example. There was only the maggot evidence inside the trash bag on the napkins. But the state didn't have the contents of the maggots analyzed by the FBI.

Can you imagine how disappointed the jurors must have been, they may have thought during the state's opening argument that they would be able to convict Caylee's killer. But then the evidence simply wasn't there to indicate that Casey was the killer. There was only a mountain of suspicion due to Casey's failure to report and her strange stories, but no evidence connecting Casey to the crime (or ruling out others). Don't blame the jury! Who could pronounce a person guilty when someone else's DNA was on the duct tape on the skull and there wasn't a whit of evidence connecting the defendant to the crime? LOL Who could do that?

"The evidence did not connect Casey to the crime", huh? I guess if you don't consider that MANY people smelled the obvious smell of HUMAN decomposition coming from her car - including those who 1) were innocent bystanders, i.e. the tow yard manager and 2) had a propensity to protect her, i.e. possibly George and especially Cindy. Also included in the group would be Dr. Vass, who had to pull his head away from the overwhelming smell from the air sample that was taken. AND cadaver dogs honed in on it as well! But I guess the fact that a couple cops who walked by her car didn't smell it after Cindy and Casey had been Febreezing it and who knows what else while it was in the Anthony's garage...is enough for you to completely disregard ALL of the others who clearly smelled it!

Question for you - if you were at the beach with 8 friends and 6 of them saw a dolphin leap out of the water, but 2 didn't...would you conclude that the 2 wipes out the other 6, i.e. there was no dolphin and the 6 were just "seeing things that didn't exist"?

And what about the hair of Caylee's found in the trunk that had shown to be from a decomposed body?

There absolutely was evidence tying the crime to Casey - Caylee's dead body had been in her trunk!!

If you want to try to hang your hat on the fact that there was no established cause of death...fine. I think the duct tape gives me an indication of how she died. And although the crime was not on video tape and narrated for the jury to see - I can make the necessary leap by "doing the math". It's really not that hard.

All of that coupled with the fact that her behavior showed 1) an obvious consciousness of guilt by lying to evade detection and 2) NO, i.e. ZERO mothers party and otherwise are unaffected by the loss of their daughter - whether it be a pool accident (no evidence of this - didn't happen) or if they are missing, kidnapped, etc. If you believe that you are essentially taking all that we know about human behavior and turning it on it's ear. This behavior goes to motive - she was happy that her daughter was gone.

All the rest of that stuff you mention is just absence of evidence - which is NOT evidence of absence. Of course there was no DNA - she had been in a humid, rain covered swamp for 6 months - nobody expected there to be ANY fingerprints or DNA, as it decomposes over time and under those conditions. Because they found had no evidence of her making or buying chloroform you conclude that she couldn't have had it?! Again, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Not EVERY little question will be conveniently answered - this is very typical, as anyone involved in cases would tell you.

Still LOL?

 

[amysmom]

I love how posters are saying the FBI took DNA from Lee and George because they suspected they may be Caylee's father. That is deliberate twisting of the truth. Yes, they took their DNA, and it is normal that when a child dies unnatural way, all immediate family members are DNA tested as a method of elimination for the crime. They were NOT tested for paternity purposes. It became apparent after testing when Robyn's letters were published that neither Lee nor George could be. George did have his DNA done amysmom.

I don't understand why this incest question or abuse question is even being discussed. The only person who even suggested it might be true, is ICA, a habitual liar. And JB who threw it out during OS and offered not one shred of evidence.

Okay so George isn't a likeable character - I agree. But to continue to promote such gross and disgusting lies about him on the "well, maybe, you never know, and it could be the explanation" is really questionable in itself. IMO.

I thought we dealt in facts and substantiating links? :waitasec:

ITA! And I have to wonder if RCA claimed her father was a 'transvestite' how many would believe it? I know that's a stretch but so is this other claim made by this habitual LIAR! imho

I admit I'm no expert on "sex abuse" victims but something tells me there are other reasons for someone to act just like RCA..And they did afterall have to come up with something to explain away those '31 days'.

 

[concentric]

Tony Lazarro said on during a posting session on another message board that the Compaq laptop which was really Cindy's did crash and bring up a blue screen. He said that on July 15th, that Lee went to his apartment to get some of Casey's things. I can't remember exactly who but Tony or Lee opened the laptop and turned it on and blue screen appeared.

I don't think that ever came up in testimony by anyone, right?