Not sure if this has been answered on this thread or not, but the diary was manufactured in 2004, so yes it was backdated to 2003.
Wow! I never knew that! I thought it was odd that she would give such a broad time reference for when she dropped off her child- 4 hours, and you can't recall exactly when? Most people have set schedules for when they drop off their children at daycare, not a 4 hour window, and 4 hours to get to your job??? What kind of job has that kind of flexibility???
Please remind me what did the computer forensics reveal about the laptop computer? Or were they unable to obtain anything because at one point I heard it crashed and was blue screened. Just wondering what I missed in the testimony. Thanks.
Here is another scary unanswered question:
NINE dead pets in twenty years?
6/16/08 her dad calls her at 3:04 p.m. (26 secs),
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2011/0224/26984466.pdf
On the Left Hand corner was handwritten "'03" in red ink. Wasn't proven if it was Casey handwriting or Cindy's...What do you mean by backdated? I thought the entry did not have a year, just the month and day?
On the Left Hand corner was handwritten "'03" in red ink. Wasn't proven if it was Casey handwriting or Cindy's...
Wow...I think you might be on to something. I mean..what are the odds that both died in car accidents within four days?! She looked at a couple papers in one internet session and it had the weeks' deaths! This girl gets more twisted all the time, huh?!
ON 6/16, whether George later recalled it or not, George KNEW Casey was @ G&C's Hopespring house with Caylee when he left for work ~2:30PM, as evidenced by his call to the house @ ~3:03PM just prior to his call to Casey's cell @ ~3:04PM.
I want to know why it is so important that not one person will say who the father of Caylee is. That is a very BIG secret to keep. Sean D. was on TV and said he was FCA's best friend. She told him to sit down and had something to tell him. She then announced her pregnancy. According to him he never asked who the father is. Strange? Mucho Strange indeed!! Can anyone fill me in because I have never seen friends and people at the age of 19 not inquiring WTH is the father?
All the family...they didn't ask. All the friends....they didn't ask. These people all lie, every last one of them. They should all pick up and move to Satsuma..
Oops!! I found the post I was referencing in my earlier comment, and I was mistaken. There was a call to KC's cellphone from George AND a call to the Anthony home. The call to the Anthony home was made before the call to KC's cellphone. Here's the post I was talking about by BondJamesBond:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2008.06.09 vs 2008.06.16 Why the Discrepancy?
I disagree, and I'm pretty shocked by your statement about the jury.
The jury had no choice. The FBI crime lab had put everything about Casey under the microscope and the evidence did not connect Casey Anthony to the crime. There were fibers, there was DNA, none of it from Casey. None of the fiber, DNA, hair, nothing at the scene was from Casey. The soil in Casey's trunk was not a match to the scene. The residues and soils on Casey's clothing and shoes were not a match to the scene.
And all the cornerstones of the state's case were refuted by testimony. The state maintained that decomposition had begun in Casey's car trunk on June 16 or thereabouts, yet all the witnesses testified that there was no smell from June 16 to June 30. There was the partial DNA on the duct tape on Caylee's skull that was from SOMEONE ELSE. (One of the lab workers and the neighbor BB were not excluded, and the jury must have wondered why the state didn't compare it to anyone else in the case. Likewise with the Q107 hair, not from Casey or Caylee, or from the crime scene investigators, and state lost interest and did not compare it to others.) The jury must have been wondering about the fibers. Obviously there wasn't any match to Casey or her car or home or the state would have mentioned it. (We knew as much from discovery.)
The state maintained the murder date must have been June 16, and no witnesses had seen Caylee after that date, yet the jury saw from testimony that Casey wasn't alone on that day....the jury had to wonder why only Casey's clothes and shoes were all sent to the FBI, why no fiber studies elsewhere etc.LOL. The state claimed right up til closing argument that only Casey had access to the items found with Caylee but that obviously was not true. (Even if the jury didn't know about the Winnie blanket being in photos at the Glenwood townhome earlier in 2008 for example, they did know from testimony that Casey wasn't the only person who had been at the A home. They may have known about the Globe photos showing the T-shirt at the townhome, I don't remember if this was spelled out for them. They did hear Cindy say she hadn't seen the shorts for months, and the Winnie blanket since May.
And, the state maintained it was human adipocere on the napkins with the pizza box in the trash, (the focus of the maggots), yet, the jury saw that the state never investigated the source of the napkins, the apartment, which didn't make much sense. Not to mention that the state didn't send the napkins to the FBI to determine if the substance was in fact adipocere. LOL.
And, the state maintained that Casey used chloroform on Caylee, yet the jury saw that it was Casey's ex-boyfriend who had a joke about chloroform on his myspace....not Casey. No evidence was presented that Casey had ever obtained or made or had chloroform, or that there was ever chloroform in the A home. And, the state showed no interest in the bottle/syringe with traces of chloroform which were found in the Disney bag 6 inches from Caylee's skull (because of the fact the bottle/syringe also had traces of testosterone? or because the Q107 hair was from someone else and might have been with these items?) The state just dropped this evidence.
The "mountain of evidence" against Casey that the state kept claiming they had just didn't exist. It wasn't there. There wasn't even any evidence of human adipocere in the car trunk from the FBI, for example. There was only the maggot evidence inside the trash bag on the napkins. But the state didn't have the contents of the maggots analyzed by the FBI.
Can you imagine how disappointed the jurors must have been, they may have thought during the state's opening argument that they would be able to convict Caylee's killer. But then the evidence simply wasn't there to indicate that Casey was the killer. There was only a mountain of suspicion due to Casey's failure to report and her strange stories, but no evidence connecting Casey to the crime (or ruling out others). Don't blame the jury! Who could pronounce a person guilty when someone else's DNA was on the duct tape on the skull and there wasn't a whit of evidence connecting the defendant to the crime? LOL Who could do that?
I love how posters are saying the FBI took DNA from Lee and George because they suspected they may be Caylee's father. That is deliberate twisting of the truth. Yes, they took their DNA, and it is normal that when a child dies unnatural way, all immediate family members are DNA tested as a method of elimination for the crime. They were NOT tested for paternity purposes. It became apparent after testing when Robyn's letters were published that neither Lee nor George could be. George did have his DNA done amysmom.
I don't understand why this incest question or abuse question is even being discussed. The only person who even suggested it might be true, is ICA, a habitual liar. And JB who threw it out during OS and offered not one shred of evidence.
Okay so George isn't a likeable character - I agree. But to continue to promote such gross and disgusting lies about him on the "well, maybe, you never know, and it could be the explanation" is really questionable in itself. IMO.
I thought we dealt in facts and substantiating links? :waitasec:
Tony Lazarro said on during a posting session on another message board that the Compaq laptop which was really Cindy's did crash and bring up a blue screen. He said that on July 15th, that Lee went to his apartment to get some of Casey's things. I can't remember exactly who but Tony or Lee opened the laptop and turned it on and blue screen appeared.