[/I]
People (especially emotionally, psychologically troubled people) operate on more than one level--and there is more than one way in which she could have accomplished the end result of her idealized life. IMO the passive, subconscious negligence scenario, followed by self-preservation and deception are more fitting with what I know about her disorganized, ill-disciplined and disordered personality. Certain aspects of your observations are plausible, but for me it doesn't all fit, or "flow" together in any cohesive way. For starters, for a crime so calculated and carefully planned, there are FAR too many glaring, clumsy, frankly just plain stupid, mistakes. (Without realizing, guess this is why my instincts or intuition have told me otherwise from the beginning.) For someone who'd according to this theory had by this time nearly three YEARS to think about doing this, she sure didn't execute a plan with the slightest coherence nor could she concoct one single story of even remote credibility that could possibly hang together--but rather chose a series of poorly thought, indecisive, spur-of-the-moment compulsive acts, followed by jumbled story after story. All of which have made me, from the beginning, think accident. In many tragic cases but particularly under age four (in a home where there just happens to be a swimming pool), neglect alone--poor parenting and selfish priorities--can EASILY cause a toddler's death. Exact dates of chloroform searches to my knowledge haven't been officially released by LE--alot of speculation, conjecture, and misinformation being passed around. So until we know with certainty, for instance, that the chloroform was used on Caylee (vs trunk) PRIOR to her disappearance, then I'm allowing this may have been part of the cover-up. When the "flurry" of calls are made, she IS at home (prior to which she made only one customary call to be sure GA had left). She WAS totally obsessed w her new boytoy, a new group of friends and this new life of her's, so likely went there to use the internet and was too self-involved to watch her toddler. Within the HOUR she's trying every person possible, on every phone possible. What could have happened there at the house, in the short span of 60 minutes? And if she was planning to do something, why in the world take the risk of doing this at a location where she might be discovered by someone popping in? To further risk borrowing a shovel from a neighbor is yet another glaring indication this was in no way planned. Why take such a risk (simply to "shove" her still intact child into bags or whatever you propose) when she could have secured one beforehand, simply chosen another tool, or worn gloves, w/out alerting neighbor. Besides, if you were planning a crime, there would be, all along in the commission of that crime a consciousness of guilt IMO, and you would be aware from that point forth that everything--from web searches and postings on social networking sites, to phone calls and text messages; from store purchases and stolen checks, to traffic cams and surveillance cams--is traceable and will all lead back to you. JMHO