Ada
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
- Messages
- 959
- Reaction score
- 8
Could be to show the public record mistakes? He was saying someting about mistakes being made is the case in his OS.
They wouldn't need to involve VT to show a data base mistake.
Could be to show the public record mistakes? He was saying someting about mistakes being made is the case in his OS.
Wow I should have taken a vacation day tomorrow. The morning session is going to have fireworks and I'm going to miss it while driving to work. I'm two hours behind eastern. :banghead:
Ssssssshhhh!
Could be to show the public record mistakes? He was saying someting about mistakes being made is the case in his OS.
So I'm guessing this will be the "new chain of events":
Caylee drowned in the pool
GA retrieved her and yelled at kc
VT ran in upon hearing these screams and grabbed Caylee, kidnapping her lifeless body
VT stole kc's car and put Caylee in the trunk
He told kc she MUST party and get tattoo'd (it was in the script)
VT then came back to the house and stole some bags and duct tape
VT then passed off Caylee to RK and warned kc he'd kill the family if she talked
RK stashed Caylee's body to then throw her in the woods 4 months later
Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
MK what are you doing in this thread? Aren't you the mock juror?? Sequester yourself at once!
Imo, KC has something over JB... that's how she rolls.
You know what's funny? In all the time I was trying to figure out these "Vasco Dagama Thompson" calls, I never could pin down why the name "Vasco Da Gama" sounded so familiar. :floorlaugh:
Epic fail on the part of my history teachers.
OMG!! Vasco Thompson!! Hilarious--I investigated him and these phone calls like CRAZY probably back in 2008/2009.
IIRC I finally after much frussshhhtration as Casey would say decided that his phone number contained 2 numbers that were transposed in some public records database to inaccurately match up with the number George was actually calling. And I THINK--but I have to go back and check if I kept those notes--that the actual number he called was someone from his work.
They wouldn't need to involve VT to show a data base mistake.
What kind of mistakes will he tie into this?
I think we all need to be careful. Any one of us could be named suspect at any minute.
:gasp:
They should have researched this throughly before releasing this
They know they have no real reason having this guys name added to their witness list. So much unprofessionalism.
Unreal.