Yup that's it.The 2 somethings to the right of the patio door just look like bird poop. There is a bird house above them.
Ok back to the one on the left of the door.
Yup that's it.The 2 somethings to the right of the patio door just look like bird poop. There is a bird house above them.
It's not just "a" problem. It's more problems than we can count. When it's barely shocking anymore that children are mowing down children with assault weapons - not to mention concerts, churches, clubs, etc. - yeah. The de-evolution of humanity.at this point in time it wouldn't be hard at all to get me to think that society has a problem coast to coast.
It's been posted on here before. A interview with Sheriff Fitzgerald on a podcast I had not heard of before then. I find it interesting to listen to. I have no clue as to Sheriff Fitzgerald's LE expertise. For all I know he may not be able to tell the difference between a fingerprint and a DNA strand. But compared to some of the other LE I've heard before - who are like listening to paint dry - he does a decent job as the 'front' man for this investigation. To my best recollection he is the only sheriff or police chief I've heard on a podcast when the case is still fairly fresh.
PodcastOne: 11/14/18 Hour 1 Barron County Sheriff Chris fitzgerald discusses the latest from a troubled town.
they would probably find SOMETHING illegal in 3 out of 4, if not 99 percent. moo
The only 3 reasons I think he/they did not to kill the teen with the parents is
1- sexual assault and then murder, disposing of body
2- sell or use her in a sex ring
3- (this is deleted as one due to no ransom asked) for ransom.
No other reason to take her alive from premise. If it was so she couldn't identify them they would have done it at the home. They needed her for more time to do something else.
Were her parents in a supervisor or mngr position at the turkey business? Because if you read reviews from employees at that plant they do not like there superiors at all. Anyone know?
It's been posted on here before. A interview with Sheriff Fitzgerald on a podcast I had not heard of before then. I find it interesting to listen to. I have no clue as to Sheriff Fitzgerald's LE expertise. For all I know he may not be able to tell the difference between a fingerprint and a DNA strand. But compared to some of the other LE I've heard before - who are like listening to paint dry - he does a decent job as the 'front' man for this investigation. To my best recollection he is the only sheriff or police chief I've heard on a podcast when the case is still fairly fresh.
PodcastOne: 11/14/18 Hour 1 Barron County Sheriff Chris fitzgerald discusses the latest from a troubled town.
Just catching up on today’s reading- i like this train of though RB. I think you’re onto something.I don’t know ...the police I think have a lot more than they say... they are painting In grays... on no of items.. but if u have 2/4 bullet casings .. hard to hear 911 call .. don’t know what they can do ..younger photos I guess.. make u think abduction.. if they know abduction certainty I guess younger photos... but why stick with em... she goes to store.. that’s not who your looking for.
They could also release toxicology from parents and there text from final days.. along with point by point locations..
Maybe release jayme text and final point by point..day or two..
Only reason I think u hold all info back is they know The Who, they know most of the how, they need need more than this person may or may not have owned a gun..and are praying for slip up to lead to body or girl... I could see 2/3 year investigation until perps ex girlfriend snaps or he brags to fellow idiot .. if they truly have POI, there friends will start going to jail on small items, and noose will tighten at some point.
Read the case of Shasta Groene - a fourth and very plausible reason will be clear. Circumstances of her abduction have many similarities to Jayme's.The only 3 reasons I think he/they did not to kill the teen with the parents is
1- sexual assault and then murder, disposing of body
2- sell or use her in a sex ring
3- (this is deleted as one due to no ransom asked) for ransom.
No other reason to take her alive from premise. If it was so she couldn't identify them they would have done it at the home. They needed her for more time to do something else.
Were her parents in a supervisor or mngr position at the turkey business? Because if you read reviews from employees at that plant they do not like there superiors at all. Anyone know?
If perp(s) went only 5ft into home...how does the chair with the ties being carried out factor into the crime? Were the ties on the chair just from a chair cushion?
Ok, so if both phones were plugged in charging in the kitchen, and Jayme quickly grabbed a phone to call 911, I think she'd probably grab her own. I guess unless Denise's were closer.You're right... I said "the phone". I was remarking on the location of where Denise's phone was found. You know the one that placed the 911 call?
Regarding the stain on the patio door.
Maybe it's luminol to make bloodsplatter visible. And I'm wondering if the stain isn't on the inside of the house..
Regarding the stain on the patio door.
Maybe it's luminol to make bloodsplatter visible. And I'm wondering if the stain isn't on the inside of the house.
I don't want to get too graphic, but the height seems to be the height of someone's head.
If James would have been close to the front door when it was being kicked open and would have moved to the right of the house, not to get slammed by the door. And was shot there. That might be reason to spray luminol on the inside of the patio door.
I also think of the case of Bible and Freeman. I don't like thinking about how that one turned out.Read the case of Shasta Groene - a fourth and very plausible reason will be clear. Circumstances of her abduction have many similarities to Jayme's.
I see your point. I believe if LE had a good idea of who had her and thought she was still alive they would not have sat back with a wait-and-see approach. They might have watched the place for a short period of time, but would have been in there as quickly as they could. I don't see this group - sheriff, state police and FBI - taking an extended wait-and-see approach.I can think of at least three cases when LE knew who had taken off with a teen girl and released his name immediately, and two of those had left behind murdered victims...imo no way LE would just wait and hope if they had an idea who had Jayme. All three girls were found and returned alive. (Hannah Anderson, Brittany Mae Smith and the recent girl taken by her teacher.)
Maybe determination of a splatter pattern on a glass door is harder than on a white wall for instance. So they used luminol to take clear pictures or film the crime scene from the inside, to get a better idea of what happened there.I considered this possibility, but discounted it. Let me know what you think.
1) The use of Luminol is primarily to detect whether blood is present but not otherwise visible (ie., someone tried to clean it up, or someone cleaned something with blood on it). This perp didn’t stick around to clean.
2) LE had no problem removing the front doors. If this door had critical evidence, I think they would have removed it as well.
Clearly something is on the door. I just don’t think it’s Luminol. I think it’s just a fogged double pane window.
moo.