Jane Doe #6 is in NAMUS. The toddlers mother is not. That was my mistake.Yes, I agree that's why I don't believe the story.
Jane Doe #6 is in NAMUS. The toddlers mother is not. That was my mistake.Yes, I agree that's why I don't believe the story.
I hope the Feds take a good long look at why the mother is not in NamUs. I personally think either SCPD misplaced her remains or decided they needed to keep her out for reasons to protect the department in some way.
I noticed your post (from May 2013, linked below). So, we understand that by choice, SCPD has never created a NamUs profile. Maybe the feds will determine if the ME even examined the remains?
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?283333-The-Toddler&p=11872325#post11872325
"I've been in contact with NamUs regarding getting the unidentified mother victim into their database. And they have been very responsive and have been speaking with the medical examiner re: this issue. However at this point and time the detectives will not sign off on creating a profile. Apparently there must be something that they do not wish to present to the public. Your guess is as good as mine but at least it does not appear to be something that was an oversight or laziness on the part of SCPD.
Why Natasha Jugo has not been entered into NamUs will probly be my next question. Again, I must say, really great people over there at NamUs."
Fieldnotes, chances are ME #2 was not allowed to enter the information for the same reason ME#1 was not allowed to.
I noticed your post (from May 2013, linked below). So, we understand that by choice, SCPD has never created a NamUs profile. Maybe the feds will determine if the ME even examined the remains?
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?283333-The-Toddler&p=11872325#post11872325
"I've been in contact with NamUs regarding getting the unidentified mother victim into their database. And they have been very responsive and have been speaking with the medical examiner re: this issue. However at this point and time the detectives will not sign off on creating a profile. Apparently there must be something that they do not wish to present to the public. Your guess is as good as mine but at least it does not appear to be something that was an oversight or laziness on the part of SCPD.
Why Natasha Jugo has not been entered into NamUs will probly be my next question. Again, I must say, really great people over there at NamUs."
Fieldnotes, theres a coverup. What are the chances the FBI will be made aware that one of the victims was never put into the system?
Drop them a line about how they held back JD 2000 tat as well
Fitzpatrick claims in the original news article they are withholding for id purposes. I linked it recently. Someone suggested he was a red herring, but i could see them withholding the tat, fitzpatrick also made the statement there was no serial killer, even though it was obvious by the jt murder there was. they've been covering this up a long time
"n November 19th, 2000, hunters came across the decapitated body of a female that had been placed in garbage bags and left in a wooded area near Halsey-Manor Road in Manorville. Four days later and only a couple of miles away, a young male corpse was also discovered by hunters, approximately one-and-a-half miles east of the Shirley exit (68) on the Long Island Expressway. The man’s body, described as white or Hispanic, five-and-a-half to six feet tall, 130-150 pounds, with a surgical staple imbedded in his chin, was disrobed of all clothing save a pair of Gap boxer shorts. He was later revealed to have been a victim of strangulation."
http://www.doenetwork.org/media/news18.html
Fitzpatrick is still withholding the image of a tattoo located on the female victim for verification purposes if they ever get a call through Crimestoppers)