OneLostGrl
I'm going against the grain- I'm going sane
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,316
- Reaction score
- 29
Guess my last post is slightly OT but my general interpretation of the law is that (simply put) it is attempting to distinguish legitimate defects of the mind from those of the heart so to speak; and to seek retribution based on which of these is found present. Maybe both in some instances or none in others but legal insanity it seems seeks in theory to establish the presence of solely a mental one, one sufficient to prevent understanding at the time that their criminal actions were wrong. So in my very inexpert opinion then it seems people w personality disorders have more (simply put) a "heart" defect if you will, albeit learned behavior (as OneGirl once pointed out) but ineligible for NGBRI. Which certainly isn't to say there's no underlying pathology, or traceable cause, but no legally culpable influences. At the risk of repeating myself since I said this earlier in thread, after CA had let KC off for stealing her credit cards and virtually every transgression in her life, CA finally decides to act like a parent and draw the line that Father's Day, threatening during an argument to hold KC accountable for evidently the first time in KC's life for stealing from her aging grandparent. So in an odd sense, KC is actually correct then when she says, "I should've been stopped a long time ago" but her statement reveals a weakness of conscience and a consciousness of guilt--and therefore a heart as opposed to a mental defect. And the law is unconcerned w such nuances, contributing factors, or how KC came to be the (reckless, irresponsible, blameshifting, deceitful or seemingly indifferent) person she appears to sadly have become. JMHO
Great post. Let me just point out though that this is not just the case for personality disorders.. the same goes for all mental illnesses, unless you had no control over your actions or were unable to know right from wrong you are going to be held accountable, as it should be!!
I would not want to live in a world where the law is forced to take into consideration when trying me for murder the way in which I grew up. Because ya know what, if they did, they would let people like me get away with murder simply because our childhood sucked and we were abused or neglected. I could kill my son and blame my mother for raising me the way she did. That is not insanity, nor should it be!
If you are willing to cross that line and take another persons life- you must loose your right to walk amongst society. We have to protect society FIRST.
Again, NGBRI is not an easy thing to prove, even for the truly insane!