Thanks for your reply! Someone more knowledgable than me can probably speak to your question better than I can about defense lawyers' strategy in general but IMO it's not uncommon for criminal lawyers to tell their clients to turn themselves in or plead to a lesser charge. Of course, that depends on how voluminous the evidence is. We don't know (& may never know) what the FBI had in terms of evidence, by the 12/13th of September. It could have been overwhelming, it could have been scant. I personally feel they had a lot of evidence (video, electronic, physical, & circumstantial). But, my comments about this, then & now, are admittedly 100% speculation.I don't think that is what criminal lawyers do, though. The person is supposed to be "innocent until proven guilty" and the lawyer's job is to try to prove their innocence - - or that they are not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, right?
I DO find it really interesting that, to date, SB has never offered a alternate version of the case. What are your thoughts on this? I'm asking genuinely.
SB has never said something like she was fine when Brian left; or she gave Brian her van because she decided to live off the land with some hippies she met in Wyoming, or whatnot. That alternate version of a case is something defense lawyers tend to start very, very early on in the media. SB has really mounted or asserted no kind of defense of BL that I'm aware of. I'm actually surprised by so many of SB 's comments, because he almost appears to be, at times, throwing BL under the bus. He's said in recent days that BL made things difficult for his parents; that nothing would surprise him about BL's notebook/this case; that BL was in distress & not in distress, & his dad couldn't stop him from leaving (a kind of private disclosure, imo, & also makes it difficult to understand how he's representing all clients equally). He even said the police did nothing wrong in this case, which I thought would have been an easy target for a defense lawyer--eg. he could have SO easily said LE had tunnel vision & hounded this young man & terrified him, & contributed to his death, etc.
Edit to add: thanks, again, for replying to me. I am always paranoid about seeming snarky to a contributor on here, which I don't want to be. I never want to be so invested in my own opinions that I'd want to hurt another person. I appreciated your question because it helped me interrogate my thoughts. It's important to continually question what we (ie, me) think we (I) know. And I'm genuinely interested to hear your comments.
Last edited: