More will come out in the trial. At this point, as someone that knew nothing about this case, I'm concerned about that smoke. I have no idea if Zach is guilty or not. WHY were 5 people given some type of immunity? WHY? I realize we're not dealing with productive members of society, that were law abiding, and willing to tell the truth, yet I don't remember any other trial when that many witnesses were offered some type of immunity in order to convict ONE person. Why is the state and apparently the feds so willing to let perps have some type of immunity when those perps are charged with the same crime as Zach? Not all are, but some do have pending trials, right?
I can't get the TBI not being more thorough in the beginning. The local LE, maybe they weren't use to missing persons, or anything other than small crimes, even though it appears they could have filled the jail with drug dealers.... but why did the TBI not know what papers his statements would be on for the probable cause? Why did he not remember getting their bank statements? Bank records in a missing person case. I would think that would be something that doesn't happen in every missing person case, thus a case you would remember. So either he lied on the stand, or he doesn't remember it. IF you watch that portion of the trial, watch his neck and head turn red. He remembers, IMO. And was shocked it was brought up.
I don't believe this defense attorney has been practicing law this many years, and doesn't have a clue what she's doing. Nope. I don't know what her plan is, but the only thing that would truly shock me is if she sits down and states the defense rest without putting up a single witness.
Did anyone else hear Autry's testimony?
I mean this with kindness
At one point we were all chiming in about how credible and believable he was! Anyway, I still believe that. Even if his early AM part of the story isn't true. I don't care that he had time with discovery. I think he could conveniently leave stuff out. But his level of detail was solid and believable. And man, he should be everybody's ON STAR in that county if they are lost.
And after all these latest comments, I'm like "oh no, people reign it in!! Let's wait for some more testimony.
Why were all these folks given immunity? This is a simple answer I believe...
Because the TBI, FBI and the whole state is under A LOT OF PRESSURE for answers after 6 years.
They believe, Zach was the biggest killer and ring leader and the state NEEDS TO NAIL SOMEONE for this crime. (I'm not yelling, promise ❤️[emoji7]only love here).
I'm just emphasizing that they picked the worst guy and said, "none of these folks are worthy, but Zach is the leader and he won't go down unless immunity is granted because otherwise no one will speak, and this crime will remain as is with everyone demanding answers and NO ONE willing to testify."
Opening statement from prosecution says Holly was kidnapped, DRUGGED, raped and murdered.
Somehow they know she was drugged. I think we will find out more about this in the coming days.
And I think what they have will continue to pin more of the DOING of her killing on ZA even if the others witnessed or were around. ZA was the master planner and the ringleader.
And I hope the prosecution stays strong and gets this guy. I truly believe so far he is absolutely the one. Justice for Holly!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk