2010.05.10 - Casey Anthony Motions Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Court will defer ruling but since both sides are required to exchange photos......then by March 31, 2011 they will determine which ones to be used.
 
State and Defense exchange photos have until March to formulate which pix using...hearing no later than March 31.

Then narrow scope and focus.
 
Baez saying the state has used the term "scantily clad" before in regards to the club photos and that they have repeatedly tried to besmirch MsAnthony's image as a mother based on the fact she went out with friends and that she was what they describe as "scantily clad" and that this description was sexist and irrelevant



Judge saying he wants arguments for which photographs the state plans to use by March 2011
 
I remember Ikia. She went with a guy whose name is escaping me at the moment. Will was his name maybe? The one she was calling/texting when she went to pick up Tony from the airport.

Wil Waters
 
Those photos of Casey in the blue dress will come in. Baez cracks me up, and the looks on Casey's face are priceless!
 
Deferring ruling. March 31st 2011-both sides to have turned over all photos they intend to use by this date so they can have time to file objections ahead of trial. State clarifying which photos they are talking about. Judge says all photos (including remains photos) as he's quite sure there will be some objections about those as well.
 
I'm sorry, but I have to publish this somewhere....Judge Perry is cute as a button. He's cherubic, makes ya wanna pinch his cheeks!
 
JB...
KC was a young single mother. Just because she was at a party drinking a beer.....doesn't mean that her child was not well taken care of.

JB just made a comment about it being a sexist comment. They will try to cite that in their argument to drop the DP based on gender bias.

The point isn't what she was wearing, it's that she knew at that time that her daughter was missing and she's out partying!:banghead:
Why didn't LDB state that?
 
The point isn't what she was wearing, it's that she knew at that time that her daughter was missing and she's out partying!:banghead:
Why didn't LDB state that?
She did, just not in those words.
 
This is so frustrating.

I think the states argument for the 'party pictures' being relevant should be because: they show Casey's demeanor during the time frame that she claims her child was 'missing'.
 
CM wants to have State tell defense what hearsay statements they intend to use before a hearing on the matter. What about the other way around??????
 
Geesh...Mason "schooling" the Judge.
 
Judge Perry cut off CM.......says he has no intent to have a mini trial. SLAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
LDB......while the table of hearsay they provided was extensive, it was not exhaustive. HaHaHaHaHa
 
This is so frustrating.

I think the states argument for the 'party pictures' being relevant should be because: they show Casey's demeanor during the time frame that she claims her child was 'missing'.

I had this same reaction as well - why didn't she spell it out?? maybe she did in "legalese" and we just aren't seeing it. AZ, where are you when we need you, LOL???
 
LDB throwing the responsibility back to defense to let her know what they have an issue with.
 
I had this same reaction as well - why didn't she spell it out?? maybe she did in "legalese" and we just aren't seeing it. AZ, where are you when we need you, LOL???
She did. She stated that the photos would contradict accounts that she gave to LE.
 
The point isn't what she was wearing, it's that she knew at that time that her daughter was missing and she's out partying!:banghead:
Why didn't LDB state that?
yeah but she was out looking for caylee-lol. it was her private detective outfits-lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
976
Total visitors
1,101

Forum statistics

Threads
626,034
Messages
18,519,393
Members
240,922
Latest member
sebsleuth
Back
Top