- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 24,938
I have to agree with this. I also think that if EB cooperated under this agreement with the presumption that she was an accessory and not the main player. If evidence determines that EB was the main player, this agreement could have grounds to become null and void.
We know that EB was stating that Zarha was ill and that is what caused her death. Depending on the circumstances, failure to get Zarha medical care could result in a 2nd degree murder charge (where there is no premeditation but a total lack of regard for human life). Even if the rape theory was put into play here, it would still amount to 2nd degree murder charges being placed on EB.
If it is true they are trying to have the agreement nullified, I would bet that the agreement was made on the presumption that EB was leading them to believe she was an accessory and not the main player. If it comes to light that EB misled them and was in fact the main player...the contract can become null and void because one of the parties involved was not showing "good faith" at the time the agreement was made.
So we understand it a little better, North Carolina law states that an accessory to murder is prosecuted and punished the same as 1st degree murder...the DP would be on the table for an accessory to murder.
Do you have a link the statute for accessory after the fact? Maybe it has changed but I posted the link to the statute I found for the state an that is not what it said at all. Said the accessory could be charged with original offense minus two degrees. Maybe there is a more current version?
Being executed as an accessory (or as a getaway driver) was overruled by the supreme court. Just like all the states that said they were going to start executing child rapist and the supreme court said it was not allowed. Only the killer can be executed, the secondary players can only face lwop at a maximum.