2011.01.05 Hearing TES Volunteer Computer Subpoena

Joe Jordan's transcript for Mr. Mason and Mr. Baez who do not appear to have read it!!! IMO
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918297/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918267/detail.html

Tim Miller
http://www.wftv.com/video/18254579/index.html
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918226/detail.html

Brett Reiley
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918362/detail.html

Brett Churchill

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918425/detail.html

PHOTOS OF REMAINS EVIDENCE IN DISCOVERY DOCS
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21252744/detail.html

WATER DEPTH REPORT!
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21909869/detail.html

3-D ANIMATION
http://www.wftv.com/video/20321952/index.html

Baez better hope the jurors do not think the way Sheriff Berry does, check it out..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoJxyKRzEL4
common sense ...that is what Jose is discounting, imo.

http://www.wftv.com/caseyanthony/

http://www.wftv.com/caseyanthony/25370431/detail.html


http://www.wftv.com/video/18255280/index.html areal video

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOCUMENTS: EquuSearch Records Contradict Witness Story
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/25290953/detail.html

RAW INTERVIEW: WFTV Presses Baez On Docs
http://www.wftv.com/video/25303092/index.html

VIDEO REPORT: Docs Released In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/25291607/index.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljYL4udxQZk

TWA!!! Don't do the defense's work for them! LOL. You had to put everything nice and neatly right here for them *waves at defense reading this*
 
TWA!!! Don't do the defense's work for them! LOL. You had to put everything nice and neatly right here for them *waves at defense reading this*

Could you imagine if there was a thread titled "To Casey's Defense: Everything You Need to Know About the Case Against Your Client, Casey Marie Anthony."

LOL (Lots of Luck) CM!
 
Was just re-reading Dominic Casey's police interview (not done yet) and he states that he has 9-12 still photographs he took at the Suburban Drive location when he searched there in November 2008.

:waitasec: Why isn't the defense all over DC? He was the one who is on VIDEO searching the site... he admits he has still photographs of the site! Why don't they go and harrass him?

I think I already know the answer to that!

IIRC, they would have to retract the "work product" claim they used at one point:twocents:
 
Was just re-reading Dominic Casey's police interview (not done yet) and he states that he has 9-12 still photographs he took at the Suburban Drive location when he searched there in November 2008.

:waitasec: Why isn't the defense all over DC? He was the one who is on VIDEO searching the site... he admits he has still photographs of the site! Why don't they go and harrass him?

I think I already know the answer to that!

That is a hysterical and spot on question. For that matter they can call the psychic crew with the van. It would be funny if all of these folks that the defense tries to pull into this matter had a Ugly Coping happy hour. What a jam packed bar that would be.So many private citizens having to hire lawwyers in that town. Now ten more. I hope the TES searchers detail that JL twisted what they were saying, much the Cindy way..
Ricardo could be code for Jeff, Amy has blonde hair but that could be code for brunette.....
http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=92295&highlight=dominic+casey
 
"I guess there is a blogger name that people use to remain anonymous". So is JB saying he has never registered on a forum with a "hat"? Really JB?? Really??

"What little blogs that we're aware of that exist on this case." Yet later in the same hearing JB states that there are thousands of blogs about this case. So which is it??


JB refers to needing this info to look into JJ's bias and THEN mentions any evidence he may have. So...a strategy tell was slipped in right there. We don't care if he has evidence. We want to prove bias. Hmmmmm

Then JB says..... "he changes his story, recording our own investigator intentionally". Does that imply that JB had his eggs in the JJ basket and now he's pizzed off that he won't play along?????

Then JB mentions needing to see the photos and blog entries as "the only way to see if that happened". See if what happened JB??
 
Was just re-reading Dominic Casey's police interview (not done yet) and he states that he has 9-12 still photographs he took at the Suburban Drive location when he searched there in November 2008.

:waitasec: Why isn't the defense all over DC? He was the one who is on VIDEO searching the site... he admits he has still photographs of the site! Why don't they go and harrass him?

I think I already know the answer to that!

Exactly! I think he would be opening a door to questioning that he doesn't want answered! JMO
 
Was just re-reading Dominic Casey's police interview (not done yet) and he states that he has 9-12 still photographs he took at the Suburban Drive location when he searched there in November 2008.

:waitasec: Why isn't the defense all over DC? He was the one who is on VIDEO searching the site... he admits he has still photographs of the site! Why don't they go and harrass him?

I think I already know the answer to that!

I wonder if the Defense does have these photos or video? We wouldn't know.

Perhaps the defense asked DC or Cindy for them and got them.

We have witnessed JB does not like to hand over Discovery even though his client signed an agreement on Oct 15 2008 to participate in reciprocal discovery.
 
"I guess there is a blogger name that people use to remain anonymous".

Respectfully snipped...how "anonymous" is it to use your real, full name as your "hat"?? :floorlaugh: I can't help but think that JB wasn't really trying lol.
 
I wonder if the Defense does have these photos or video? We wouldn't know.

Perhaps the defense asked DC or Cindy for them and got them.

We have witnessed JB does not like to hand over Discovery even though his client signed an agreement on Oct 15 2008 to participate in reciprocal discovery.

Well, Cindy was printing out stuff from WS at one time. I'm wondering why he hasn't just asked her to do that again, or get one of his cronies who reads here to do it, unless the issue is that he doesn't know JJ's name on here and that is driving him bonkers, lol. I bet that is what he was really after with that motion.
 
Well, Cindy was printing out stuff from WS at one time. I'm wondering why he hasn't just asked her to do that again, or get one of his cronies who reads here to do it, unless the issue is that he doesn't know JJ's name on here and that is driving him bonkers, lol. I bet that is what he was really after with that motion.

BBM

I know that JJ disclosed his screen name(s) on the various sites. I can't recall if it was during the defense depo or to LE. :waitasec:

Either way, JB has access to them because he admitted during the hearing that they had searched and read his posts.


eta: Just re-read AZ's post. He for sure disclosed them to LE. If JB would READ the darn discovery .... :banghead:
 
I will NEVER understand why a certain blogger is allowed to attend every hearing as if he's a journalist. After all the trouble he has caused, he should not be allowed in the court room. Seems like it's just asking for more trouble.

ITA, and recently this certain blogger stated on said blogger's blog that he might try to sneak his laptop into the courtroom, so he could blog from the hearing. :rolleyes:
 
ITA, and recently this certain blogger stated on said blogger's blog that he might try to sneak his laptop into the courtroom, so he could blog from the hearing. :rolleyes:

He actually said that publicly.....put that out on there on his site?!?

My word. lol
 
You don't have to be a journalist to attend the hearings, you know. I've seen quite a few folks in the courtroom using their laptops while the proceedings are going on. I guess it isn't prohibited. Sometimes it is annoying to hear the continuous click clicks.
 
You don't have to be a journalist to attend the hearings, you know. I've seen quite a few folks in the courtroom using their laptops while the proceedings are going on. I guess it isn't prohibited. Sometimes it is annoying to hear the continuous click clicks.

BBM

Rules vary for a number of reasons ( jurisdiction, judge, federal v. state, etc..) but I've never been in a courtroom where spectators in the gallery were allowed to use laptops while court was in session. I don't like it, personally. Like you said, it is annoying...distracting. Plus, I find it disrespectful to the process.

Hopefully, the leash is loose for pre-trial and it will not be allowed during trial.

Funny how cultures vary. About 10 yrs. ago I did some work in Bay County, FL (panhandle). It was a very laid back atmosphere. I remember feeling :eek: the first time I walked into court and every other paralegal/assistant and the court reporter were all wearing shorts. lol Not cut-offs or gym shorts.... I mean they were nicely dressed...it was just culture shock for me. We were there during August and I came to appreciate it real quick.
 
I was under the impression, from the two hearings I attended, that the media were allowed to use their lap tops. Media were the only people I saw using them and the court even had a power strip running along the floor in one row to accomodate the media. I have no idea whether a spectator would get away with using a lap top. I guess it would depend on the alertness of the deputies assigned to the courtroom if it is not allowed. I have never seen any rule preventing it or heard anyone say no lap tops. I have heard them say turn off cell phones, but most people just put them on vibrate, I guess that is ok.
 
ITA, and recently this certain blogger stated on said blogger's blog that he might try to sneak his laptop into the courtroom, so he could blog from the hearing. :rolleyes:
And his attempt was successful. ;) I remember being surprised to see him typing away on his laptop.

It's the video of the sanctions hearing. Here you go: Part 3 @ 18.06 minutes, watch the guy in the blue shirt.
 
And his attempt was successful. ;) I remember being surprised to see him typing away on his laptop.

It's the video of the sanctions hearing. Here you go: Part 3 @ 18.06 minutes, watch the guy in the blue shirt.

NoName -- I was surprised too - even grabbed this screen shot that day.

MDlaptonon-2.jpg
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
215
Guests online
564
Total visitors
779

Forum statistics

Threads
627,117
Messages
18,539,026
Members
241,193
Latest member
karmic14U
Back
Top