2011.03.07 Motions Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
  • #222
"Miranda Rights Miranda Rights Miranda Rights"

THUD!

Reaching, are we????
:banghead:
 
  • #223
I can't believe GA and Ca both chewing gum. Caught George shaking his head in agreement of Mason. What a pain. Those big bad cops and that little tiny killer. IMO
 
  • #224
If Mason does the closing argument during trial the jury is gonna need a lot of Red Bull.

I don't know about the jury but I'd better be ordering it in by the case. This is taking every ounce of effort I have to listen to Mason mumbling on and on - unable to come to a point or for that matter any point. :banghead:
 
  • #225
CM- she was never informed that she had the right to leave or terminate the questioning
 
  • #226
Casey sitting stone-faced. Never any emotion except to flirt with lawyers or anger at father, unreal.
 
  • #227
Cheney Mason does not both me as much as he bothers others. I understand that he has a job to do. He is stating what he was told by his clients parents. He has no choice but to say these things because his job is to get these statements suppressed.

I would rather listen to him than JB.

Told by his clients parents?? He's arguing...and getting the facts wrong....about testimony in court that he was present for. :waitasec:
 
  • #228
This is terrible. Worse than I thought! Not persuasive at all.

Does he have marbles in his mouth - cuz I don't know what he's saying, or what any of this has to do with 2.5 days of testimony. He is completely going off topic and should be banned or given a serious time out!

MOO

Mel
 
  • #229
Does CM always ramble like this????



**Geesh**
 
  • #230
She never wanted to leave cause she likes being around men.
 
  • #231
  • #232
Gotta go to work, dang it...just wondered if anyone notices she is not writing with her favorite pen today.
 
  • #233
Casey listening intently to CM with arms crossed, hands clasping her forearms as if restraining herself. Looks a little like a human straight jacket :floorlaugh:

n1cu2q.jpg
 
  • #234
I quoted this case which may not be the best in my position. CM

Then why use it CM????
 
  • #235
Hmmm... defense not defending ICA as to HOW she tried to seriously help find Caylee???
 
  • #236
Mason has no passion for this argument. I think he knows it's a goner.
 
  • #237
CM is summarizing: Evening of July 15, CA called 911 - and was described as aggitated and hysterical saying "I want her arrested!" This begins the psychological pressure of a young 22 year old with no prior involvement with law enforcement, no street kid and no idea what was going on. Then 4 deputies arrives all in 'full regalia". She was questioned and then the next undisputed fact is that she was handcuffed by the deputy. This fact somehow evaded the knowledge of supervisors and the prosecution. Because she was handcuffed it cannot be argued that she was not in custody right then - and it started right then - she was led out to the car, patted down and put in the back seat of the car in the caged compartment where she could not open the doors or roll down the windows. Then she was driven to Sawgrass by a deputy in 'full regalia' and another deputy questioned her about the apartment and the nanny scenario - still no Miranda.

She was brought back and taken for a walk by Hosey and now a suggestion has been made that she had been "unarrested". CM cites Williams v. State - "there is no such thing as unarrest".

Judge Perry interrupts: at what point were the handcuffs taken off? Were they taken off before she went to look at the apartment? CM answers no one remembers that so clearly.

CM then says in the totality of the circumstances that she is in a psychological circumstance of her mother yelling for her to be arrested and the handcuffs and the uniformed deputies make it feel to her like she is in custody.

She is then questioned by Melich who takes her into a room in the house where the two were in there alone; she is isolated from her family at that point; no Miranda.

There is evidence that there were harsh tones from time to time.

Looking through the eyes of the defendant, 22 yo with no experience with law enforcement and she is in an environment where she does not believe she can leave or not speak. She was never told that she could leave or didn't have to talk to anyone. This went on until about 3:30 in the morning. LE leaves.

Then the deputies come back in the morning. And they took her at that time in the car and both CA and GA said they were told she will not be back - this is relevant to the whole concept of their intent to have her in custody.

They took her to Universal - they did not invite her to meet them there; he didn't ask the family will you bring her to Universal in the morning? This shows intent by LE to have her in custody.

Now they get to universal and there are 4 big guys including head of security at Universal - they are in a secured area not open to the public and they take her down a hallway whereupon they put her in a small conference room about 10' by 10' (CM shows an area of the courtroom about the same size) with 3 ARMED detectives and KC and they closed the door and did not give her Miranda - and they kept the door closed.

LE says the door was closed for privacy - but regardless of the reason stated by LE, CM is arguing that a closed door means something different to the reasonable person - that she was not free to go.

So under the law we must evaluate whether her freedom was deprived in any significant way;

JUDGE PERRY NOW GIVING CM HIS OWN RESEARCH ON THIS:
Parks v. State 644 1994
CM has not read that case :0

CM cites Ross v. State, FL Supreme Court
Find the totality of the circumstances analogous to KC's case.

...

http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/briefs/2007/2001-2200/07-2111_rep.pdf
 
  • #238
  • #239
JA is in a veeery good mood today. Or CM is making his day. Can't tell which.
 
  • #240
Cheney seems to avoid the fact that it was Casey who lead them to Universal, to show them her "office".

And if I'm not mistaken, didn't she do that because she told them she had another phone there or phone numbers for Zanny or something like that?

So of course they would take her there to get them - just as they took her to all the fake (as it turned out) addresses she told them about.

Building a case? Yes, ultimately. But first and primarily trying to find a missing toddler or any clue as to her whereabouts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
169
Guests online
2,389
Total visitors
2,558

Forum statistics

Threads
632,443
Messages
18,626,598
Members
243,152
Latest member
almost_amber
Back
Top