Turnadot
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2007
- Messages
- 3,763
- Reaction score
- 4
Not really. If he didn't alert the police, I do wonder why, but hindsight is 20/20. We all wish we could turn back the clock sometimes and have a do over for certain moments.Is Mr. Birch's failure to act responsibly after smelling decomp being brought into question? Or, is it his testimony that's being questioned since he didn't call the police?
If it's that he should have called the police and is negligent for that I would have to remember that he's not on trial. If it's his testimony that's in question then that will be put to rest when GA is called back and corroborates his story.
He comes across like a good person. I'm not calling his character into question. But if a few of us wonder why Mr Birch didn't call the police then at least a few jurors wonder, too. So far Mr Birch is excellent for the State. I really don't think him not calling the police right away when he smelled human decomp is going to matter to the jury during deliberations.
If I were on the jury I'd be curious why he didn't ( if he didn't) call the police, but during the deliberations, I would answer it myself like this: Because he didn't. We all have coulda, shoulda, woulda moments. Hindsight and all that bit.