2011.05.31 TRIAL Day Six (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #81
Mason: At some point - it has to stop (the rule of sequestration) then the cousins could come in and a whole courtroom (shrug) blah blah....no case law - draw the line here - it should have been drawn with the Anthonys......in all humiliation......(lots of luck here) - vigorously objecting...
 
  • #82
I bet the DT doesn't want LA in the courtroom so that if ICA ever does testify she won't have to look him in the face while she slanders him.
 
  • #83
CM: "I dont really care about them" speaking of CA & GA

thats very obvious Mr. Mason, IMO
 
  • #84
oddly enough CM is not as annoying to me as usual this morning. Depending on how long he is talking that may change. I find his argument pretty well reasoned thus far. Still want LA in tho so I hope he loses.
 
  • #85
I do agree that it can prejudice the witness but the fact that it is broadcast on the TV makes it kinda a moot point.
 
  • #86
imho.. of COURSE she/they ..DT... doesnt want to have any family she intends to destroy in the courtroom.... throwing them under the wheels of a train!
 
  • #87
Morning all...I see CM is only concerned about ICA rights.
 
  • #88
CM - her name is Caylee, not "that child" gggrrr
 
  • #89
Hey, yeah - I haven't seen JB yet either! :waitasec:

The courtroom looks kind of empty.

No, Baez slipped in just as the HHJP came in
 
  • #90
think HHJP is may allow this!! good!!
 
  • #91
ga head down.jpg

kc purple.jpg

hhjp and thumb drive.jpg

cm quotes case law.jpg
 
  • #92
I'm sorry but this is just crazy as all get out ... Lee can go home (or anywhere) and watch this on TV/Internet.
I know, it is like they are pretending the trial is not telecast. LOL LOL

It is a Casey world argument, let's pretend.
 
  • #93
Yeah, LG... I see him now! Thanks!
 
  • #94
HHJP: is Mr. Lippman you may proceed, sir.

CM: a comment about what was...going to say

HHJP: ? confrences are available.

ML: Same motion that was for Cindy and George. The same case law if I may approach?

HHJP: you may. Mr. Mason Mr. Baez.

ML: it is the same exact motion we just argued. (citing case law) Material witnesses could attend the hearing...I'd like to ask if both of them had the opportunity to depos Mr. Anthony and was that memorialized. Mr. Mason have you depoed Lee Anthony?

CM: ?

MG: me, LDB, JA, JB...Miss Lyons was there?

HHJP: you opted to take his depo?

FG: yes

HHJP: and the defense opted not to take his depo? but was present when his depo was taken by the state of Fl. I take it from you silence the answer is no.

JB: the answer is no

HHJP: written statements to OCSO. the reason for the sequestering is ? a witnesses testimony. Okay Mr. Lippman anything else?

ML: although the defense did not get to depo Mr. A...

HHJP: state's position?

FG: no issue

CM: as you have said sequestration...to keep their testimony from being colored...there is a presumption although many of us my scoff at it...legislation knows what they are doing when they write it...the fact of the matter is when they said next of kin they did not define it...not a single case that allows a uncle to be next of kin...and I can say that after fairly extensive research...a uncle in a custody case...there have been extensions for children by case law and mothers as opposed to just husband and wife. In the Beasley case the defendant brought his son and daughter. Ones where there were challenges or one where the defendant wanted...there are a number of them and we find none where the defendant objected to an uncle...here is the situation at some point it has to stop what if Mr. Lee Anthony had already married the fiance? Anyone we can fill the court room with...there has been some impact on the testimony of the father....having listened to opening statements and all the witness including the tow truck and mr. anthony is called back again. We are asking the court not to extend what we see as a problem into an...line needs to be drawn...it should be drawn in his opinion with the Anthonys. In all humility...I don't care about their rights...Casey's rights...criminal case. We object. If you are interested in reading the cases I would like to state Davis...Gore v. State, (citing case law) Rose v. State...in that case the mother of the victim was allowed in the court.

HHJP: mr Anthony was taken...on July 30 2009 Mr. Baez was there and AL was there, Mr. Newcomb(?), Mr. Baez conducted cross examination starting on pg 376. Cross was not that long...(long pause)and just a second...
 
  • #95
Love, Love, Love, HHJP!!!

I could listen to him all day!!
 
  • #96
I LOVE LOVE LOVE that HHJP unzipped that robe...whipped out a thumb drive...and is now reading off depo answers from his computer.

He does not miss a beat.
 
  • #97
  • #98
oh here we go with the not hearing!
 
  • #99
How come it's only when HHJP says something the DT won't like Mason claims to not be able to hear?
 
  • #100
CM tells HHJP, he can't hear...me thinks it is a bit selective...like my boys.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
2,858
Total visitors
2,978

Forum statistics

Threads
632,113
Messages
18,622,209
Members
243,023
Latest member
roxxbott579
Back
Top