LDB: excited utterances. Mrs Anthony gave testimony at the time. they are not hearsay at all they are not trying to prove the matter.
HHJP: I am trying to fashion an instruction. the evidence you are about to hear is about Cindy's state of mind. Excited utterance. Do not take into account the defendants criminal acts.
LDB: there are statements of Miss Anthony there are statements in the call and in the third call Miss Anthony gets on the phone and answers questions as well, I believe the limiting instructions would be only for the first but not the third, I do not believe there is any reference in that call to the money or the car being stolen.
HHJP: stolen car and bank account I will specifically mention.
LDB: I do not mean to use the transcript, we have the recording synched to a transcript for the jury to watch but I do not intend to put the transcript into evidence. when the recording plays the transcript with appear with highlight of words spoken. we are to provide copies and I have them marked as exhibits so the record can be clear as to what the jurors saw and heard.
HHJP: mr baez I think that is what you requested.
CM: I cannot make out what he says.
HHJP: To be honest I did not look at 2.4 but I can look it up.
CM: I cannot make out what he says.
HHJP: 2.5 has to do with Williams rule evidence
CM: ?
HHJP: I sort of looked at 2.5 which follows that...
CM: ?
HHJP: probably could use some 2.4 I can add however the defendant is not on trial for a (?) wrong that is not in the indictment.
CM: see or hear...the final...?
HHJP: just a second.