HHJP: the evidence is only to mrs anthonys state of mind and as an excited utterance and not anything else such as stolen car or bank accounts. however the defendant is not on trial for any crime that is not included in the indictment.
CM: i certainly think the courts special instructions...violition of 404 and 403 that not with standing I appreciate what you have done.
HHJP: lets bring in the jury
(Cindy back on stand)
you may be seated
HHJP: jury, the defense?
LDB: we seek to introduce "ML" into evidence
HHJP: noting previous objections it will be received into evidence. I have two things to read to you. One is a stipulation. On July 15th 2008 Cindy made a call to OCSO the recording is a true and accurate representation of the call and it should be considered as true in your dilberations. The 911 call is to be considered by you only as to you Mrs. Anthonys state of mind and as a excited utterance. Ignore stolen car and bank account. The defendant is not on trial for anything not included in the indictment. You may publish.
We can't discuss her body language? So, we can't say she is angry or shaking her head or crying? Not trying to be snarky, just trying to understand. :blowkiss:
I saw a lawyer on one of the show (JVM?) say she was consulting with the DT also I think Jayne Weintaub? also has input. Who knows how many defense lawyers are working behind the scene for Casey and crew. moo
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.