2011.06.21 TRIAL Day Twenty-four (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
prosec not necess planning to call april whelan.. But they are invesiatig her for rebuttal possibilities.
by abcashleigh via twitter at 11:05 AM
 
THey gave us a hard drive and I would equate it with giving us a phone book


FGS Jose... If you didn't look at Casey's computer activity on June 16th, the day Caylee drowned, that's on YOUR head.
 
JB complaining the state gave them too much paper work to look through and find out the key info.

He again wants the state to do his work.

LAZY
 
bobkealing bob kealing
#CaseyAnthony Burdick: may be something in it for use as rebuttal. Also may use substantial computer activity from Anthony home 6-16-08.
 
Baez is trying so hard to implicate some sort of wrongdoing on the part of the state.
 
Perry: No discovery violation from state. Interesting possible rebuttal preview though.
by bobkealing via twitter at 11:06 AM
 
JB" this is like giving us phonebooks and telling us to pick" ( paraphrased)

Yeah you don't have any wild goose chasing theories out there yourself.
I simply cannot watch anymore. He makes me ill.
I seriously do not think he realizes the laughingstock that he is.
 
JB standing to the right of LDB and looks ticked!!! ICA knows she's been busted by the amazing SA team. Shooting daggers at LDB. Can this case get any stranger?

She hasn't taken here eyes off of SA.
 
This is so sad. JB saying that the SA is focusing in on a "story". Really JB? :waitasec: You made up the "story".
 
Well, yeah, duh, JB. Because of what you stated in your opening statement. Yeesh.
 
I'm going to scream!!!!!!!!!!

Does JB not know that the SA doesn't have to point to specific things in the discovery. THAT'S HIS JOB!!!!!!!

I had one case that we requested some documents from opposing counsel. In turn they sent us 52 boxes of material! 52!!!!! Guess who had to go through all those boxes looking for the 20 page report we really requested???? Yup me.

Litigation means work. JB STILL doesn't get that.
 
OMG JB is saying that there is no way we could have gone through all this evidence- so they can't pick a different piece of these thousands of paper so how could we know???
Are they really saying this? We didn't get a computer expert b/c they weren't going that direction? Is that an excuse???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
203
Guests online
731
Total visitors
934

Forum statistics

Threads
625,906
Messages
18,513,383
Members
240,878
Latest member
JusticeSauce
Back
Top