2011.06.21 TRIAL Day Twenty-four (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. Baez is looking somewhat subdued this morning....DNA from decomp??? Didn't get a Frye hearing on this? No peer review or anything to substantiate this information? What does JB think he is doing?
 
Has anyone else noticed that JB rarely refers to HHJP as "Your Honor" ... but rather "sir" instead? :rolleyes: Decorum, BAEZZZZZ!

LOL

Here I was like 'Whoa...he called him Sir!' I'm used to Judge.
 
JB STILL doesn't get what is supposed to be in those expert reports does he? Or rather, he doesn't care.
 
woaaaa...is JB kissing up to JP now?? really JB? just wow......calling your honor, taking his info from a prior case in account, etc.....
 
Of course JB wants a Frye hearing....in the middle of trial!
 
I thought they were going to deal with these issues at 8:30, what the heck!
 
Baez telling HHJP how he was touched by JP's personal experience and how it inspired him. PLEEZE
 
I am curious if DNA was in Eikenbloom's original report?
 
While I'd like to argue.... In other words, I'm going to spew some venom but I'm going to tell you that I'm not
 
"In an effort to move things along..." THIS, coming from BAEZ? lol
 
JB pronounces "ruse" as "roooos". In referencing JA's objections etc
 
Oh no here we go again...State's creating a ruse and inflaming the court to seek sanctions.

Bad Jeff. ;)
 
Good Morning.
I had three windows open - one for our discussion, one for the trial and one for ICA - and thought I was set and was ready for the action to begin.
Then, the trial window showed ICA coming in with her tied back shirt and when the cameo camera started, it showed her in a blue shirt with the big sweater over it. I was in a panic.
I had to reset everything and now I hope I have it straight with both showing her in blue.

Now, I'm way behind again today. Hearing JB spouting away.
 
Not trying to be snarky but ICA appears to be wearing clothes (at least the top half) that might be suitable for someone her grandma's age.
 
If Suebert (sp) doesn't know anything about low copy DNA, why was she testifying about it? Jeez JB.

Oh, and the request for sanctions is a State "ruse". I guess that's why HHJP mentioned it himself yesterday.
 

JA up to HHBP about depo they took yesterday from Dr. Eichlinbloom.....
he didn't form opinion until 2 days ago....not peer reviewed....he and his opinion that could not withhold through a Frye hearing....scientific principle ability to obtain a certain chemical from a certain body (ie: dna) Defense has already had one witness testify ...Ms. Seubert already testified about dna able to come or not from ...


All reports from experts were to be in by a certain date....Mr. Eickenbloom (?)


JB - filed respons w/court 12/15/10 - listed CV, trace recovery, sentence 3 if he were called to testify re: dna and trace and ....substantive ....until then difficult to give his opinions .....issues raised about degredation of dna....this notice should have put the state on notice.....this is completely different than Dr. Rodriguiz....as issues came up and when your honor gave us personal experience....take that knowledge....these opinions were formulated on that Saturday....we were going to take depos and expand on what he was going to testify to....call Mr. Eiklenbloom to testify solely to deal w/dna degredation....JB would like argue that JA didn't object to Seuberts testimony....now he creates a ruse to Frye issues and all......solely limit to dna and degredation......

Mr. Mason will deal with other issues


 
Cannot wait until HHJP rules on this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
221
Guests online
471
Total visitors
692

Forum statistics

Threads
625,776
Messages
18,509,647
Members
240,841
Latest member
womanofsteel69
Back
Top