2011.06.24 TRIAL Day Twenty-seven (Afternoon Session)

[Kat]

Edwards is excused.

 

[Searchfortruth]

The defense has no defense.

 

[frogger]

HHJP must take Ginkgo Biloba. . .just rattles these cases off left and right.

Or he takes the same medicine CA does!

 

[KathrynL]

Yay, sustained. On another note, I am somehow relieved I will not be able to see testimony tomorrow. I've lost too many brain cells trying to live through the defense already. I really feel for the jurors.

 

[Softail]

The DT is really reaching. The big bad police picking on their client.

 

[liltexans]

Judge says this testimony isn't relevant and doesn't lead to the defense's theory. Edwards is excused n #CaseyAnthony -jfell
by cfnews13casey via twitter at 2:58 PM

 

[BritsKate]

DT thwarted.

One less wheel to roll over GA.

 

[ZsaZsa]

Sustained.
HHJP just wiped some more DT ***** off his shoes.

 

[nursebeeme]

holy night they need to proffer every dt witness....

 

[Talina]

So now CM is accusing the investigators of tunnel vision?

No, no. That was yesterday's accusation. Today's accusation is why is Casey on trial when clearly they were focusing on CA and GA at one time as well. :floorlaugh: They can't decide. IMO

 

[marlap]

Yay Judge Perry!!!

 

[Blue Ridge]

JP said Pop Tart LOL

 

[ami]

How many witnesses now have been excused for relevancy? Two yesterday and this officer guy as well? 3?

 

[anb]

Judge just said on the Pop Tart route. Hehe!

 

[sleutherontheside]

casey whispering like crazy behind her hand in jose's direction.

He pays her no mind at all.

yep

 

[pinkfly]

4:00 let’s go ahead and do the next sidebar well we are here

 

[ohiogirl]

It may get to a point where His Honor prescreens each and every defense witness just to save the jury. JK

 

[Amil]

Once again a witness is wisked away from the jury. hA!

 

[okiedokietoo]

(defense needs to do a proffer)
HJBP does not want to bring Jury in and send them right back out

 

[wenwe4]

EE testimony (missed a few minutes)....wanted to capture their conversations with Ms. Tinnelli - did she decline to do that? don't recall - she was somewhat ...she didn't say no but was willing to entertain other ideas but not her favorite - wanted to talk to her husband before she ....

did you meet with her a 3rd time - wear a concealed wire on her person - talk to her @ Lowes about this...possible but window of opportunity never presented itself...

any questions on the profer Ms. LDB? I do not.

Jb & CM whisper to each other

CM are you aware of any voice mail messages left on Ms Tinelli phone? Mrs. Anthony did I believe but I don't think it was GA...I don't have a transcript....did you have a transcript of that day? I believe Sgt Allen recorded that date I don't know about a transcript....

HHBP allright Mr. Mason what material fact does this evidence tend to prove or disprove what relevancy does this have to theory of defense? how much time do I have- as much as you need to take

I asked him to establish a material fact and it doesn't

Part 2 of question - what relevancy as to theory of defense- multiple levels the dysfunctionality and what happened after the accidental drowning.

the wearing of the wire ...to get incriminating statements from the parents...

HHBP - since next witness is out there were they able to do it?
CM - no sir they asked but she declined

LDB - without asking what their motivation would be is irrelevant as relating to kc guilt or innocence - not obtained so only thing left is the motivation - not for this jury to consider @ this juncture.

CM - interesting based upon speculation....yet murder weapon was duct tape we are supposed to speculate on that
LDB - objection
HHBP - objections about arguments is needless waste of time - no jury here and I know what is going on...

neither side want conclude remarks

FL Supreme court - 2006 decision said it is within the trial court descretion what is relevant evidence - requirement for admissablity is relevancy - evidence code - evidence tended to prove or disprove a material fact....quite clear of the profer of the LE - it does go to prove a fact ....second does not go to the theory of the defense....at this time DT theory at the time accidental drowning and the after behavior is what DT expouses to certain things....therefore not relevant and will be sustained under 98vs401 and (doesn't) ?goes to theory of defense

hereby excused detective I am sorry...HHBP

Do you still intend to call the next witness? CM = we will call briefly Tinelli ...is it for a different purpose or the purpose of the profer? on the ducttape - I just want to make sure we don't send these folks out on POP tart route....I would rather bring it up now than to have jury come in and have them back out ....I have no idea who this witness is and what she might testify about....we will be at ease...CM out to make sure she is ready