2011.06.27 TRIAL Day Twenty-nine (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is the third time I've heard 'regurgitate' since lunch! Two by JP and one by JA!
 
ROFL

"I think the court understands my argument." - JA

Oooh, that was a burn to the DT. You could almost hear him underscore the word "court" when he said it.
 
JB says (speaking of the Dr) "He is a chemical analyst. He analyzes chemistry."
 
IMO......ICA's calm demeanor this afternoon is the flipside to this morning's mania.
 

JB w/Furton profer - what do you know about chloroform? General knowledge chemical compounds from education and training....referred to World Health Organization report on chloroform - thorough review of documents and peer reviewed articles refer to chloroform and it's environment....how long have you used GCMS? 25 years...chloroform come up in frequently? used as a solvent and have seen it's chemical compounds....could you tell us about consumer products and chloroform...google scolar...some websources on internet....these sources for rendering opinoins? depend on the source...in cases where no peer reviewed study I would use the information with caution....been told not to refer information about the most recent findings...opinions render have nothing to do with most recent internet research you have done....

JA - ever done any research bout presence or absence of chloroform in household products? no ....what experience other than reading what experience....as an analytical chemist is compounds of chemicals....based upon what you have read not what you have done....done peer reviewed articles and dr. Vass reports and articles...

JA - witness can give an opinion but cannot regugitate to jury what he has read....a witness may not be used for information...ie: I read somewhere household cleaners can contain chloroform....this witness cannot .....if I may quote Mr. Mason's friend Mr. Airheart pg 6767...Lind has apparently resolved an expert cannot testify on evidence ....if this witness is saying this level of chloroform ...violate Lind

JB - I thought we agreed to this before lunch....he is saying this based upon experts reasonable relied upon....not to bolster with the journals I have cautioned him about that ...not to name research or improper bolster...going around in circles Judge you made a ruling.....

JA I think the court can understand my argument

HHBp - Dr can give his opinion he can simply regurgitate his opinion.....

can on cross refer to it if questioned about what he based his research on....Dr. Furton understands conditions of ability to testify about his opinion....


 
It would seem to me that all Ashton has to do on cross is say "Dr. Furton, have you personally done any research yourself on household chemicals for the sole purpose of analyzing chloroform?"
 
Who is breathing so heavily, I hear heavy breathing...anyone else?
 
How much ya wanna bet there's still an objection over what JB tries to get this guy to say?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
272
Guests online
658
Total visitors
930

Forum statistics

Threads
625,845
Messages
18,511,721
Members
240,856
Latest member
du0tine
Back
Top