JA w/Furton - humans are more alike in death than in life in chemical compounds. yes
student in study published this year....held dust buster looking device and held it over the body for approx 1 min....not using triple sorbent traps...those are much better than what was used.....more likely in morgue vs. crematorium background chemicals....study tuna/chicken/lamb meats process for human consumption...meat from the animal...went to resturant or went to Publix....not prepared not cooked but it did decompose....huge difference between human decomp compounds but animals.....yes...a great deal of difference between human and non-human @ least from that chart...yes
reference # 6 & 7 Dr. Vass buried body studies....his only the longitudinal study in terms of whole bodies - correct....how many studies use triple sorbent traps? common use for environmental sampling....the Satheropolis and the Vass studies used triple sorbent traps...very minute compounds in very small amounts object- overrule....common method, one method, not the only one used....of these studies cited how many covered whole bodies vs. just parts....the ones listed here are those same 4....Sateropolis and Vass....the other studies were things typically used for k9 training aide......blood, adipose tissue, bone, often times early stage decomp material like placenta or human derived material - not a whole body but certain material with human with decomp.....the studies with whole bodies are....not necessarily .....
....carbon compounds collected in triple sorbent traps....is Dr. Vass the only one who looked @ triple sorbent traps and longitudinal study....I don't believe so - Strathropopolis didn't come up with the same compounds.....But Dr. S studied over one day.....consistency with human compounds ....don't compounds change as decomp proceeds? yes become more prevalant and .....
Vass studies only one in anerobic conditions - without air.....Vass study contributed most to the research because he looked at it a different way....agree more information the better to draw an opinion...yes more studies the better in determining human decomp....chemical analysis of the odor is not enough to establish human decomp.....is helpful in limiting other causes....can you tell me about the 4 items Dr. Vass referenced can you tell us the 4 items for a dead human body in the trunk of car plus other chemicals present from other materials....chloroform and carbon tetrachloride only reported in 2 studies....so far published lit do not identify those .....unless you discredit the study which you don't....those could be human decomp....I guess I am discounting those studies being of limited scope and reliablity and replicatable....do you discount the
vass study.....the in his study he did not run standards basing on mass spectral interpretation which may or may not be correct - saw those based on GCMS....question whether his 2004 and 2008 paper done thoroughly and properly....normally run standard times....did not do that - they just relied upon the GCMS ....remember depo taken 2/19/11? please read these pages.....