Below is a quote from a news article someone else posted on this thread......Sorry i dont recall who linked it for credit to the article........
From the Seattle Times Local News..........
Originally published February 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM | Page modified February 9, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Share:
Comments (287) .E-mail article .Print
Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
""Orr, in his statement, said that five to six minutes elapsed between the time the caseworker's call came in and a deputy was dispatched to the Powell home. When the caseworker couldn't immediately recall the address of Powell's house, she asked the call taker if he could use GPS to track her location via her cellphone. The call taker said no.
Kris Dessen, spokeswoman for the Law Enforcement Support Agency, said that Pierce County has enhanced 911 services, which allows GPS tracking. But, she said, the tracking system is not always accurate. She said that call takers
always ask a caller for the address of the incident location, as well as use GPS technology to track the location. Dessen said whether the 911 technology was able to track Sunday's call is under investigation.
He said his department is still waiting to receive a copy of the "call-and-dispatch" log from the 911 center to see exactly how long it took for deputies to respond.
Jennifer Sullivan: 206-464-8294 or
[email protected]. On Twitter @SeattleSullivan.
Information from The Associated Press is included in this report."" (End quote of article)
I still feel they could have located her faster than what it took her to find his address in her car, but the 911 operator who took the call did not deem it an emergency call and i think that is why he said NO when asked about the GPS. I also feel in my opinion that if the SW was asking if he could find her by GPS, then she knew her phone was a GPS enabled phone.
I felt from the article that i am not the only one "condeming" the situation reguarding GPS and the 911 operator!
Again, My Opinion ONLY!
ArtzyPantz