I thought I was done with the Objection: then noticed the exhibits!
Truescope exhibit A: Love the graphics.
Estimated 2.1 Billion impressions (opportunity to see a story) 11/13- 6/6 time period
The metrics over time graphic is

.
Key Phrases used to look up the case: The phrase I use to search wasn't included. Interesting to see the different phrases used and their popularity.
Media types in use, no surprises.
Need to look up Rebecca Boone: 1086 Stories.
Authority figures MPD highest impressions.
Non-Authority figures J Coff. highest
Attorn SG had a high number of Impressions
Looking forward to Truescopes testimony. MOO
Then Exhibit D
Fascinating!!!
Amani El-Alayli - I love that name
Social Psychologist. Social Cognition Researcher.
These are only a few points: the whole report is so interesting.
As social psychologist, I can identify number of ways in which media exposure regarding the Kohberger case or the parties involved would likely bias the opinions held by the public, and thus prospective jurors in ways that cannot be mitigated easily or at all.
Unfortunately, the most reliable solution for preventing bias among jurors is the prevention of exposure to this information in the first place.
Thus, deliberation is not seen as method for eliminating pretrial publicity exposure effects, and can even worsen them because it provides means to spread information to jurors who had not yet been exposed.
She talks about what 100% sure really means.
MOO: 100 % sure really means 80% sure 20% of the time. I think that is what she is describing. MOO
MOO
Edit: moved the 100% sure statement to last and tried to clarify it.