Because they don't just want to say that someone else could have done it, they have specific people in mind and they haven't (as yet) met the judges criteria for proving those people are viable SODDIs.
We haven't seen the 43 second video. We've only seen 2-3 seconds where he is zoomed in.
Haven't they destroyed enough lives?
I just don’t see how anyone can think it’s fair to preclude the defense from presenting evidence of other suspects. That’s insane and puts a guilty verdict, if there is one, in jeopardy.
Delphi Murders trial: Day 13 live blog
Delphi Murders trial of Richard Allen continues with testimony from witnesses. Allen is charged with murder of two girls in 2017. Follow for updates.www.wishtv.com
News 8’s Kyla Russell reports that Delphi Murders Special Judge Fran Gull has ruled that no testimony about Odinism during the trial of suspect Richard Allen.
Gull again denied a renewed defense requests to present testimony about Odinism, Norse paganism, and ritualistic killing. The judge also will not allow testimony about potential other suspects.
Exactly. The DT cannot point the finger at me simply because my username is SouthEnd and the girls were found south of somewhere. They had three days to present evidence that their SODDIs were anywhere near the vicinity of the crime (opportunity) and they did not. IANAL but the fact that none of their SODDIs could be places anywhere near the scene by phone data or witnesses... it means the theory is a no-go.
Genuine question. They couldn't prove that any of the SODDIs had the opportunity. Doesn't that preclude them from being named as alternative suspects? IMO they'd have a better chance pointing the finger at the photographer person, who at least was physically in the location (please, DT, if you are reading this, don't take my advice. I am only making a point.)
And then they all pointed at the image of BG and said forget our descriptions, that was the person we saw. Back to square one, IMO.
Yet we were not in the court room. It's highly possible there are many things that were said, or shown, or seen by the jury, that has convinced them of some important things. I do think they will be able to reach a BARD decision.
Yes, I am aware of that - that was the man who found them mr. PB. I was asking about the evening / night prior - do we know if anyone went south from the cemetery side down towards the creek? ty
There is evidence of other potential perpetrators though.
Not at all. I don’t expect everyone to understand the legal ins and outs, but I do expect reporters to know what they’re talking about.
Everywhere.
Can you point me to where witnesses said the man they saw was not the man in the photo - bridge guy?
Oh i vehemently agree it was more a statement rather than a cause on my part for concern, except for BW, as I do believe their only offense to defense now stops at him.
Where? I've followed the case from day 1 and have never seen the video. It was shown in court, but I wasn't in court.
But was there evidence they were anywhere near MHB at 2:13pm on the 13th of February 2017? That's the line on the sand, for me. If they couldn't have been there, they couldn't have written secret messages with the arrangement of the sticks.
