Funny how that works isn’t it?So RA’s wild hissy fits were not shown to everyone, but naked brutalized dead children are OK.
Funny how that works isn’t it?So RA’s wild hissy fits were not shown to everyone, but naked brutalized dead children are OK.
BBM - trials are supposed to be public. What is with this hiding exhibits from the public gallery?#NEW: This morning the jury was shown videos of Richard Allen inside Westville Correctional Facility. The screen was turned almost entirely away from the public, though, for “several people’s privacy,” according to the defense.
The media took as many notes as possible on jury reaction.
<snip>
I don’t get it and I don’t like it- neither should have been shown to the public or press - just the jury- in my opinionSo RA’s wild hissy fits were not shown to everyone, but naked brutalized dead children are OK.
I don't think they made an unreasonable motion to have him appear remotely considering the circumstances. Did she provide a written reasoning do you know? Ty in advance. (edited for spelling by me).From AB’s live last night, she was saying JG didn’t like how the subpoena was only sent to the agent 2-3 weeks ago. So basically, the defense being ill-prepared shouldn’t put an extra burden on the court or something.
JMO
I also agree. Just gives a glimpse of where a jury might be when all is said and done. RA was there along with other people but prosecution did not convince me he was the only one who could have committed the crime unequivocably.I have to disagree. It absolutely proves RA is bridge guy especially with the video Libby took.
Around here it’s common for graphic images just to be shown to the jury- especially those involving children - in my experienceBBM - trials are supposed to be public. What is with this hiding exhibits from the public gallery?
Perhaps they don't want to show the courtroom the conditions he was actually held in? I don't believe for a second this has to do with preserving his dignity at all. MOO. This is a total lack of transparency again imo.So RA’s wild hissy fits were not shown to everyone, but naked brutalized dead children are OK.
We can certainly agree to disagree - thank you for the engaging discussion.I have to disagree. It absolutely proves RA is bridge guy especially with the video Libby took.
Her decision here feels questionable but I am not a lawyer.I don't think they made an unreasonable motion to have him appear remotely consider the circumstances. Did she provide a written reasoning do you know? Ty in advance.
Yes because it was also noted that they had the information since August. So basically you had info since August and when did you subpoena him and it was October.From AB’s live last night, she was saying JG didn’t like how the subpoena was only sent to the agent 2-3 weeks ago. So basically, the defense being ill-prepared shouldn’t put an extra burden on the court or something.
JMO
Don’t want everyone to see RA eating poop or sporking himself, I guess. I don’t quite follow how showing the victims deceased and naked is okay but RA’s “psychosis” is a step too far.BBM - trials are supposed to be public. What is with this hiding exhibits from the public gallery?
Any idea what this inmate may testify to?Quick note...at the end of Friday, Judge Gull did give permission for inmate Jesse James to be transported to testify.
![]()
Former fire chief says he saw no clothes in creek the night Abby and Libby went missing | Day 13 of Delphi murders trial for suspect Richard Allen
Seven years after Libby German and Abby Williams were killed, the trial continues for the man accused of murdering them.www.wthr.com
The Murder Sheet said the DT said that Jesse James was very important to them, more so than some of the other transport requests that they had filed.
No idea about a written reasoning. It was handled during session yesterday.I don't think they made an unreasonable motion to have him appear remotely consider the circumstances. Did she provide a written reasoning do you know? Ty in advance.
So RA’s wild hissy fits were not shown to everyone, but naked brutalized dead children are OK.
@steeltowngirlI did it! Is that admissible?
The testimony coming in sounds like the professionals responsible for diagnosing and providing psych care determined that he was genuinely experiencing psychosis. The guards and Wala to some extent have some motive to view things through the prosecution’s lens - and Wengler only went by Wala’s reports.…or was advised to up the antics by his attorneys. Must not forget that being noted by both guards & Dr. Wala concerning when his behavior would increase. I hope little things like that don’t get lost in the distractions being put up by his team.
JMO
The defense has no burden to prove or clarify anything. The police should have done their job better. IMOif only the defence had a witness who could clarify where his phone went ...
A lawyer never has a strategy of being ineffective.i have often thought possibly an ineffective counsel appeal to be their core strategy.
Yeah but apparently the prosecution did not object. So what's her issue? MOONo idea about a written reasoning. It was handled during session yesterday.
I can understand not wanting to give a bunch of leeway for something that seems like it ultimately falls on the defense for not being more prepared in a timelier manner. If that’s the case, everyone will just submit late subpoenas to try and get their witnesses to appear remotely.
I do wonder if this is something they actually should have been aware of before August, but were too busy chasing down odinists to have discovered before then.
JMO