AK AK - Steve Keel, 61, missing from hunting trip, from TN - Aug 27, 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMHO Although I am athletic and do hiking I AM NOT an experienced back packer, remote camper, or knowledgeable hunter. There have been several cases recently where people out hiking, etc. have gone missing and people who have separated from their partner for various reasons. Unfortunately, there have been tragedies in those cases.
1. My uninformed question. Is it a normal practice to leave your campsite alone regardless of if you are familiar with the area? Walking 30 feet to go the the bathroom seems normal. Going 1/4 mile alone in a remote unfamiliar area not so much. Would it be dangerous to be carrying raw meat back to the campsite?
2. Would they be hunting for anything else to continue camping? Please remember I'm not experienced so my questions may sound dumb. Seems like they did well. Is it common to cook some of the meat?
3. I'm not accusing, just asking. Would it be likely that a person would sleep in the van and wait before reporting their friend missing?

Members have been providing excellent experienced information. Thanks all. Thanks for your patience with my bumbling questions.
Everything about this seems normal .....until it doesn't. Hope for the best outcome.

I'm not sure how normal it is to have a hunting party of only two people. That seems like a really poor starting point. Yes, indeed. It would be dangerous to carry fresh meat on your back and walk 1/4 mile by yourself. If you got caught in the mud it could be very difficult to get out. It would be impossible to defend yourself from a bear attack. His friend should have called for immediate assistance when it was obvious that too much time had elapsed for a walk to the cache and back. Even so, if only and hour had elapsed, it may have been too late ... but to leave him overnight and wait 24 hours?! I can't understand it.
 
IMHO Although I am athletic and do hiking I AM NOT an experienced back packer, remote camper, or knowledgeable hunter. There have been several cases recently where people out hiking, etc. have gone missing and people who have separated from their partner for various reasons. Unfortunately, there have been tragedies in those cases.
1. My uninformed question. Is it a normal practice to leave your campsite alone regardless of if you are familiar with the area? Walking 30 feet to go the the bathroom seems normal. Going 1/4 mile alone in a remote unfamiliar area not so much. Would it be dangerous to be carrying raw meat back to the campsite?
2. Would they be hunting for anything else to continue camping? Please remember I'm not experienced so my questions may sound dumb. Seems like they did well. Is it common to cook some of the meat?
3. I'm not accusing, just asking. Would it be likely that a person would sleep in the van and wait before reporting their friend missing?

Members have been providing excellent experienced information. Thanks all. Thanks for your patience with my bumbling questions.
Everything about this seems normal .....until it doesn't. Hope for the best outcome.
Not dumb questions at all, and similar to many I have asked myself. I unfortunately cannot answer them.
Other than perhaps what I might do myself Re your first question, I would not consider it normal for anyone unless they were perhaps a native to the area. I would definitely think carrying fresh raw meat around would not be the safest thing as, would it not make you a target for predators?
 
Thanks, I meant Bryan. Too late to edit now. Chet is the knowledgeable one.

I agree with your hypothesis that he thought he could wing it to some degree because he got lucky doing so in the lower 48 and didn’t understand how unforgiving Alaska is. You can’t wing it up there. I also think that his known gear wasn’t rated for much more than a summertime campout at a lower 48 state park; I looked up the tent and… oh hell no.

Having modern gear doesn’t mean squat if you don’t know how to use it or it’s wrong for the environment. The Inuit didn’t survive in the arctic for thousands of years sleeping in flimsy tents purchased at a Tennessee Walmart.
Brilliant. About how I think.

The odds of survival, IMO, require a basic sense of what could go wrong, and how to address it.E.g. hypothermia, physical injury, lost, hyperthermia, pre-existing conditions, predator attack, accident (e.g. by sharp object), fall, sun protection, .... I call this framework and how to address it as Backcountry 101. This means 10 essentials, water-protective gear, wicking apparel, supportive footwear and synthetic/wool socks, insulating layers, fire/stove, protective tent, relevant sleeping bag, hat and gloves, adequate nutrition, communication device, first aid etc. You need these anywhere: Rockies, Yosemite, Alps, Tennessee.
Almost all these basic concepts were missing from the menu in this case, even for the lower -48. (Cf. Chet's videos). And that was BEFORE you get to the AK necessaries for tundra in late fall, where you'd also have to plan for imminent emergency as opposed to outlier emergency. It doesn't seem as though the basic framework (e.g. Backcountry 101) was in place just so you could project at all closely to the conditions and terrain.

And I agree that modern gear does no good unless you know how to use it.
 
Last edited:
There have been several cases recently where people out hiking, etc. have gone missing and people who have separated from their partner for various reasons. Unfortunately, there have been tragedies in those cases.
Snipped for focus

Great questions.

There is a statistically high incidence of folks going missing in the backcountry who are solo. Interestingly, they are preponderantly day users. SK would count in this category, since he was going on a quickie jaunt.
The reason day tripper fatalities in the backcountry are proportionally high is because backpackers have all their gear with them: robust ways of staying warm and dry, ability to get hot food, a water plan, headlamp, etc. I would guess backpackers also have a lesser tendency to end up in terrain that is over their abilities (or too far from the trailhead), mostly because they have to schlepp a bunch of weight. Day trippers, on the other hand, might easily overestimate their abilities and choose something that could be dangerous for them. The latter is not rare at all. GCNP has now stationed trained volunteers in place to head off newbies intending to go down a difficult trail.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how normal it is to have a hunting party of only two people. That seems like a really poor starting point. Yes, indeed. It would be dangerous to carry fresh meat on your back and walk 1/4 mile by yourself. If you got caught in the mud it could be very difficult to get out. It would be impossible to defend yourself from a bear attack. His friend should have called for immediate assistance when it was obvious that too much time had elapsed for a walk to the cache and back. Even so, if only and hour had elapsed, it may have been too late ... but to leave him overnight and wait 24 hours?! I can't understand it.
AFAIK most out-of-staters hunting in the tundra are dropped by boat or plane at their campsite. No schlepping around basics. This transportation is provided by "outfitters". Some rent equipment: this would keep you warm and dry, and give you a fun experience.
There doesn't seem to be a prohibition against solos, but to me that seems extremely risky. The odds of a problem are very high in this environment, though the outfitters also require a Garmin inReach for communication.
 
Not dumb questions at all, and similar to many I have asked myself. I unfortunately cannot answer them.
Other than perhaps what I might do myself Re your first question, I would not consider it normal for anyone unless they were perhaps a native to the area. I would definitely think carrying fresh raw meat around would not be the safest thing as, would it not make you a target for predators?
I would say: not just carrying around fresh meat, but stinking of fresh slaughter, and wearing antlers. I wouldn't want to look like caribou out there!
 
I would say: not just carrying around fresh meat, but stinking of fresh slaughter, and wearing antlers. I wouldn't want to look like caribou out there!

Hehe, good point. Don’t want to be wandering around during hunting season looking like Bambi. Someone upthread brought up hunter orange - yup, yup, and yup. I don’t hunt, but if I go hiking near where folks could be hunting I wear a hunter orange vest and hat and I have my dog wear an orange vest too.

I don‘t get the camo gear either, AFAIK most animals are interested in movement, sound, and scent; you can dress up like a clown and as long as you hold still, stay quiet, and are upwind, they‘re not going to detect you or they don’t care. Your gun/bow is just another stick to them as long as you’re not wobbling it around.
 
Hehe, good point. Don’t want to be wandering around during hunting season looking like Bambi. Someone upthread brought up hunter orange - yup, yup, and yup. I don’t hunt, but if I go hiking near where folks could be hunting I wear a hunter orange vest and hat and I have my dog wear an orange vest too.

I don‘t get the camo gear either, AFAIK most animals are interested in movement, sound, and scent; you can dress up like a clown and as long as you hold still, stay quiet, and are upwind, they‘re not going to detect you or they don’t care. Your gun/bow is just another stick to them as long as you’re not wobbling it around.
Yes, camo is a fashion statement except at war when it’s human on human.

In this case, fashion statement may have contributed to catastrophe. It wouldn’t be the first time. There’s still one missing from last year:

 
Parts of TN are mountainous, difficult, and full of tangled vegetation, but it’s a walk through a children’s playground compared to northern Alaska. You absolutely cannot underestimate how vast, remote, and dangerous it is up there, especially if you don’t know what you’re doing. You can’t just take whatever you’ve learned hunting and camping in the lower 48 and cut & paste it for a trip in AK and think that it’s enough, it requires its own special knowledge, skills, gear/supplies, and you have to have good judgment and be able to be honest about your abilities and limitations.

As for the native peoples, they don’t have “nothing,” they have everything for surviving and thriving in the arctic thanks to tens of thousands of years of skills, knowledge, and wisdom. Steve and Chet could have benefitted from consulting with them.
<modsnip: referenced post removed> I stand corrected that Steve and Bryan had hunted in Tennessee in rough areas so they would be prepared for this trip as well. Hypothermia doesn't care how low the temp gets. With this in mind they would be fine in terms of avoiding hypothermia. Bryan was in the same camp as Steve yet he didn't get hypothermia. IMO its not as simple as it appears.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am absolutely sure he was not hunting caribou with the Glock pistol. Pistols are not made for hunting, that's what the long barreled guns are for.
I never said he used the glock for hunting the caribou that is a given. Steve and Bryan probably had hunting rfles or as you said long barrelled guns to kill the caribou. So he had ammunition in the hunting rifle so why would he not have ammunition in his glock?
 
In the photo of Steve with the Caribou horns on his back you can clearly see by the emblem that he is wearing “Muck” brand boots which are famous for their waterproofing and durability. However they are not very well suited for long hikes. They are slip on boots without laces. The conjecture in previous posts that Steve was not using waterproof boots is incorrect.
 
In the photo of Steve with the Caribou horns on his back you can clearly see by the emblem that he is wearing “Muck” brand boots which are famous for their waterproofing and durability. However they are not very well suited for long hikes. They are slip on boots without laces. The conjecture in previous posts that Steve was not using waterproof boots is incorrect.
The waterproofing wasn't the problem. The lack of support is, especially in that terrain. But it also seems the waterproofing wasn't adequate for the task. Per Chet, SK's socks left in his tent were wet; it was 20 days before BC's feet returned to pre-tundra condition.

What I like about Chet's explanation, actually, is when he details exactly what he (Chet) wears to keep his feet dry. Layers and layers, and NEVER boots like that. He even trialed SK's socks.... Chet's layers include waterproof pants, gaiters, more than one baselayer (including one that is Smartwool)....

Chet aims for dry from tundra water, and doesn't care if his setup retains sweat: at least it's warm.

Perhaps even more importantly, waterproof muck boots are useless if water gets over the top. In tundra, it will.

Cotton pants—which it seems SK was wearing—would keep water in the boots. Not just an occasional drip, but a DRENCHING amount. See how he keeps his pants tucked into those boots? That cotton will soak up water like a sponge. Recall, the tundra is not just ankle-deep in water: it can be MUCH deeper. And the water is frozen ice. Every time SK stepped, he would have been squeezing cold water from the pants into the boots. They probably filled with water.

Also, Muck boots are neoprene (I have some, and I'm looking at them right this minute), except on the lower shin and foot, where they are rubber. Neoprene is wet-suit fabric. Yep, the stuff that keeps you warmer in cold water, but does not keep you dry (it keeps a layer of water against your skin). They are not water-proof breathable, and they are hellish hot, even in mid-winter. You'd want to be wearing very expensive socks, like Smartwool or Darn Tough of the really thick model.

So, yeah, Muck boots are theoretically designed to keep your feet dry, but not in AK or in the wilderness. People use them around here for farming, mucking out stables, getting maple syrup, places where you're unlikely to get an ankle roll. I only wear mine in the yard, and in snow. (They shred my feet; the only advantage is I can get them on quickly.) Maybe they use them for hunting in Kentucky, but I can't think they do much backcountry walking in them in rough terrain.

One very likely scenario for SK's disappearance is that he rolled an ankle, became incapacitated, and very quickly succumbed to hypothermia. The latter almost certainly happened (he'd only have avoided it if he was spirited to heaven), but a rolled ankle from inadequate support might very well have been a precipitating event.
 
Last edited:
Hehe, good point. Don’t want to be wandering around during hunting season looking like Bambi. Someone upthread brought up hunter orange - yup, yup, and yup. I don’t hunt, but if I go hiking near where folks could be hunting I wear a hunter orange vest and hat and I have my dog wear an orange vest too.

I don‘t get the camo gear either, AFAIK most animals are interested in movement, sound, and scent; you can dress up like a clown and as long as you hold still, stay quiet, and are upwind, they‘re not going to detect you or they don’t care. Your gun/bow is just another stick to them as long as you’re not wobbling it around.
Yep, dressed like bambi, moving through tundra, carrying fresh meat, and reeking of caribou from slaughtering one the day before really would be a grizzly come-hither. And they evidently didn't carry bear spray (guns are not a match for charging grizzlies, and can be very dangerous if attacked).


It is not usual for hunts to be staged this way (as SK and BC did) for hunters from the lower -48. They would normally be dropped by boat or plane right to the campsite. Hunters are picked up by boat or plane at the end of their trip, with the meat and trophies. This would put kill activities in the camp area, and the cross-tundra lugging would be minimal; hunters would substantially lower their risk this way of being vulnerable to predators.
 
Last edited:
So, I checked out “Rent a hunter’s camp equipment in Deadhorse”. This is such a no-brainer! Look what you get for $500 for the whole trip! And note the photos of the dome tents. They are designed to shed wind: exactly what you need on fall tundra.


See how heaters are standard equipment, and an entire gigunda propane tank for each tent? They can do this, because they drop you into camp by plane or boat.

This isn’t just practical and fun equipment: it’s lifesaving equipment, even the dishwashing tub (otherwise you’d be getting sick from contaminated meat). Almost all of it is about staying warm, fed, and rested, all features that appear to be lacking in the TN hunters campsite.
 
A rule-of-thumb backcountry food plan, average temperature, in lower -48 is 2lbs per person per day. The game is to get the lightest, least bulky, most calorie rich foods into that 2 lbs.

If you think about how to put this together, the optimum efficiency per calorie would require a stove. With fuel and pot, this might weigh only 1 lb. Then, you can carry piles and piles of compact and light dry food and add boiling water to "cook" it. Think how much instant oatmeal, instant rice, or instant grits you can take... ****You can eat really well on the max 2lbs per day! And with powdered soups, coffee with sugar, you can keep yourself fed and well-hydrated. They weigh almost nothing. And with a pack of tuna or chicken (or fresh kill), and some dried fruits and veggies, and maybe nuts, you can be quite well fed (provided you're not out indefinitely).

I'm adding this note here, so it's easy for unfamiliar folks to get an idea. Alot of what would be needed for a trip to the tundra is an upgrade to lower -48 basics. I think most of us can imagine what the food items I've just mentioned will look like, just by checking our pantries. And this is what you'd expect to see more or less in SK's and BC's pack if planning appropriately for lower -48. Evaluate from there.

And if there's no stove? Ay......

****Uncle Ben's Instant Brown Rice: 1/4 cup bulk = 1.6 oz (dry) = 1 cup cooked (after adding boiling water) = 160 calories

PS I met one couple on the AT who did a computer projection of best efficient use of that 2lbs. They zoomed in on gorp (dried fruit, nuts, M&M's). All nicely spreadsheeted out. Densely caloric. Very compact. They mixed gorp for months of eating and mailed it to themselves when hiking the AT. Funny thing...about 2 weeks into my trip I started to notice sacks of gorp abandoned in shelters along the trail. I guess the plan looked great on a spreadsheet....
 
Last edited:
This post was linked on the official Search for Steve facebook page. This is the most comprehensive description I've seen yet, of what happened. If you want to go read the whole thread, it's on the Search for Steve facebook page.

 
This post was linked on the official Search for Steve facebook page. This is the most comprehensive description I've seen yet, of what happened. If you want to go read the whole thread, it's on the Search for Steve facebook page.

If anyone cares to dissect this account, here it is. I will say the way it ends with criticism of the North Slope Borough personnel is ridiculous. There are reasonable explanations for the refusals but bias is endemic in the retelling of this tale by those who value Steve's life more than that of potential "rescuers". Not sure the part about AST is true at all. MOO!

Steve Keel from Dover Tennessee, was last seen August 27, 2022 in Deadhorse Alaska.

Steve Keel and his hunting partner landed in Fairbanks Alaska on August 19, 2022.

They rented the blue van, then went to sportsman in Fairbanks to purchase hunting licenses and gear.

The two men departed Fairbanks on 8/20/22 heading north via Elliot Highway then the Dalton Highway, North.

They arrive at their parking spot on the 21st at mile marker 346 on the Dalton highway, on the right side of the Dalton hwy (east).

They hiked approximately 2 1/2 miles west and set up camp next to the lake. (Pictures above of lake and coordinates).

On August 22 they hiked west to the 5 miles point to hunt Caribou. This would be approximately 2 miles west of the lake camp. His hunting partner shot a Caribou on the 23rd, Steve shot a Caribou on the 24th.

On August 26, while hiking back to their lake camp, Steve, allegedly got tired and put the meat pack down this was approximately .7 miles from the their destination (lake camp).

They decided to leave the pack and retrieve it the next morning after food and rest.

The next morning they ate breakfast & had coffee.

At approximately 11 AM Steve left out for the meat pack, alone. With no rifle or GPS device. (Those were left at camp).

He was wearing a safari style floppy hat, a fleece, long sleeve sweatshirt, camo pants, and boots, he had a Glock 45 pistol and a Kirkland brand throwaway water bottle, & a iPhone he was using as a compass.

Three hours after Steve left the lake camp, he still had not returned. The meat pack was. 7 miles from the Lake Camp.

The hunting partner started walking towards the meat pack to find Steve. He got to the top of the hill and was looking down at the meat sack, but did not see Steve.

The contingency plan in case of an emergency, was to go east to the Dalton highway, find the van and seek help. His hunting partner hiked the 2.5 miles to the van to find Steve. Steve was not there.

It got dark, the hunting partner decided to stay the night at the van.

The next morning he hiked back to lake camp to see if Steve had returned; He had not.

The hunting partner then hiked the 2.5 miles back to the van.

The hunting partner than decided to hit the SOS on his satellite device. This would've been over 30 hours since Steve was seen.

Northstar borough in Deadhorse Alaska, is heading the investigation for Steve keel as a missing hunter that just wandered away from camp.

They refused to request a search dog in the critical hours to determine the direction of travel.

They refused to request help from the Alaska State Troopers, that were willing and ready to assist, but needed the request from the North Star Borough.

They refused to deploy a cadaver dog to try to find Steve or his remains before the weather turned cold.

Outside agencies were willing to help, but couldn't deploy without a request from the NSB .


Please, if anyone saw, or talked to either of these gentlemen, or recognize the van, please send me a private message.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
622
Total visitors
756

Forum statistics

Threads
625,722
Messages
18,508,627
Members
240,836
Latest member
Freud
Back
Top