It is not going to be AJ ...? :thinking:
I must admit, I'm waiting with bated breath for the release of his name...
It is not going to be AJ ...? :thinking:
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/girl-in-s...-and-daughter-khandalyce-20151022-gkg80o.html
Sorry I see that is the same as the URL posted by Eloise
I must admit, I'm waiting with bated breath for the release of his name...
Yeah, Im thinking some blowhard came into her life, big promises etc...
Come away with me we'll make our fortune.
Except things went awry and it all went to he11.
Gotta say, I wonder how many other girls go missing that we never hear about. I wonder if govt ever works out the number of people who drop off the earth permanently who are never found again. These girls weren't even missing people, just gone .. And if their bodies hadn't been discovered nobody would ever have known.
I think the killer will turn out to be a woman.
I think the killer will turn out to be a woman.
Whoa!
That's left field.
What keeps going through my head is the differences of the 2 murders.
Mother was killed and body unceremoniously dumped behind a fallen log in a forest.
The child was killed and yet her body was kept, decaying somewhere, not buried or out in the sun, according to forensics.
The suitcase of the child's belongings was also kept for many years.
Then the child's bones were place into the suitcase and the suitcase was dumped.
I'm wondering if the scenario might be that Karlie was befriended by a childless woman or a couple, who thought they would be better parents than Karlie was.
(Not judging her parenting at all, but simply setting the possible mindset of the killer(s)).
Possibly Karlie was killed first with the intention of keeping her daughter.
Then at some later date, the child was killed.
This would explain an emotional attachment to the remains and belongings of the child but no emotional attachment to the mother.
It would explain why the child's possessions were kept and cherished, along with her bones.
Why the suitcase was eventually dumped at Wynarka though is another question entirely. Yet it still seems whoever did the dumping could not bring themselves to separate the bones from the possessions..
I think the killer will turn out to be a woman.
Yes Saebreze1, sorry, I should have said I think a woman is "involved", if not actually the killer of either.
Yes Saebreze1, sorry, I should have said I think a woman is "involved", if not actually the killer of either.