4.16pm
21 people, 24 hours: The ‘surgical examination’ of Erin Patterson’s account
By
Erin Patterson had the right to remain silent in her own murder trial, forcing the prosecution to prove their case without her testimony.
She could have stayed quiet, her barrister Colin Mandy, SC, told the jury in courtroom 4 in Morwell on Tuesday afternoon.
Instead, he told a packed courtroom in Morwell that his client chose to enter the witness box and face “the scrutiny of the whole world”.
“She decided to give evidence,” he told the court. “To give her account and subject herself to several days of cross-examination by a very experienced barrister.”
Taking the stand, he told the jury, meant facing public scrutiny about the fine details of her account and every word she had told people years earlier.
In the box, she laid bare her account, he said. “Admitting to you that she lied to the guests at the lunch, admitting to you the lies that she told once she realised that foraged mushrooms might be in that meal.”
Mandy told the jury that his client had spoken to 21 people across 24 hours at the hospital, as well as other people who were not witnesses in the case, and that her version of events remained generally consistent.
“There are others as well who spoke to her, asked her questions about the meal, preparation, where she got the mushrooms ... Meetings, appointments, phone calls, interviews, questions,” Mandy said.
“In any meaningful way, her account was the same to those people.”
Mandy said it was difficult to imagine a more intense “surgical examination” of someone’s account for such a long period in the witness box when they’ve sworn to tell the truth.
On that point, proceedings were wrapped up for the day.
Mandy is expected to continue giving his closing address tomorrow.
Inside courtroom four in Morwell, Patterson, on trial for murder, listened intently as prosecutor Nanette Rogers, SC, concluded her closing argument, and defence barrister Colin Mandy, SC, commenced his.
www.theage.com.au