Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

  • #1,861
As far as I know Gus's father has full parental rights so he was able to take his son to his living place in a fully legal way. There was no need to ambush him or keep him in the dark.

Exactly!!!

He might have had alleged argument with his in-laws
but it doesn't affect the son to whom he has full parental rights as a father.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,862
As far as I know Gus's father has full parental rights so he was able to take his son to his living place in a fully legal way. There was no need to ambush him or keep him in the dark.
That's my understanding also.
But if dad wanted to take Gus, he would have organised it with the mum and not just randomly take him from the sandpit, right??

Because he's got full parental rights, so when he has Gus it's at his discretion?

Maybe Jess did call him to let him know his son was missing, and his phone may have been on do not disturb if he was sleeping.

Imho
 
  • #1,863
@katydid23 you make an excellent point.

The fact that no one called the dad, not even the cops tells me there may have been some initial suspicious on the dad. But since then the dad has been cleared of involvement and he's been holed up in Adelaide, reportedly upset about his son being missing.

Was the geographic seperation of parents amicable?

I am not certain that this is a fact. We don't know who may have tried to call the dad, or even if they successfully reached him. The arrival of the police at his home does not exclude the possibility of phone calls.
 
  • #1,864
I am not certain that this is a fact. We don't know who may have tried to call the dad, or even if they successfully reached him. The arrival of the police at his home does not exclude the possibility of phone calls.
You're quite right. I have edited my post.
 
  • #1,865
Well...

As was reported
Father was angry that it was Police, not the in-laws, who notified him about son's disappearance.
And that it happened so late.

So I guess he was on phone all the time.

JMO

Quote

"It is understood Mr Lamont only found out his child was missing when police woke him up at his Belalie North home,
hours after Gus had vanished."

 
Last edited:
  • #1,866
If I were to have suspicion, and I'm not saying I do, but if I did, the focus for me wouldn't be on dad. I don't think Gus was 'taken' from that property. I don't think Gus wandered off into the bush....and I don't even think Gus was playing on that sand/dirt pile. I think one must look back prior to the young lad's reported disappearance for answers. That's just me, and it's my opinion, admittedly potentially being completely wrong.
 
  • #1,867
As far as I know Gus's father has full parental rights so he was able to take his son to his living place in a fully legal way. There was no need to ambush him or keep him in the dark.
As far as we know, but we don't have the full picture, imo. And I do NOT believe the father took Gus. I was just saying that LE, in immediate aftermath, would have to be open to that possibility.
 
  • #1,868
Ok so let's hypothesise that no one called the dad, not even the cops...were initial suspicious on the dad?
When a woman goes missing or is found dead, it seems that in many western countries and quite possibly Australia, New Zealand as well initial suspicions are on her husband or partner. It's possible that it's similar for a missing child when one parent doesn't live on the property - that this parent gets checked out by the police asap.

MOO
 
  • #1,869
If I were to have suspicion, and I'm not saying I do, but if I did, the focus for me wouldn't be on dad. I don't think Gus was 'taken' from that property. I don't think Gus wandered off into the bush....and I don't even think Gus was playing on that sand/dirt pile. I think one must look back prior to the young lad's reported disappearance for answers. That's just me, and it's my opinion, admittedly potentially being completely wrong.
I don't think Dad took him either. I was just saying that LE would have to consider that as a possibility on that first night he went missing. He would be an automatic suspect until cleared. IMO
 
  • #1,870
When a woman goes missing or is found dead, it seems that in many western countries and quite possibly Australia, New Zealand as well initial suspicions are on her husband or partner. It's possible that it's similar for a missing child when one parent doesn't live on the property - that this parent gets checked out by the police asap.

MOO
Yes, that was my point. When a child goes missing, a custody battle is often the motive behind it. LE is always going to look to the other parent if they are not in the home. IMO
 
  • #1,871
As far as I know Gus's father has full parental rights so he was able to take his son to his living place in a fully legal way. There was no need to ambush him or keep him in the dark.
If that had happened (if Gus had been perfectly legally taken by his own father), would the father be legally required to tell the other parent where Gus was?

I would think yes, but maybe it's actually more of a moral "requirement" than a legal one.
 
  • #1,872
If I were to have suspicion, and I'm not saying I do, but if I did, the focus for me wouldn't be on dad. I don't think Gus was 'taken' from that property. I don't think Gus wandered off into the bush....and I don't even think Gus was playing on that sand/dirt pile. I think one must look back prior to the young lad's reported disappearance for answers. That's just me, and it's my opinion, admittedly potentially being completely wrong.
I’m with you on this I don’t think the dad has taken him.
If Gus wandered off surely he would have been found given the extensive searches .
I think if he was abducted someone living in the area would’ve noticed dust clouds from a vehicle.
It seems suspicious to me too but I may be wrong
 
  • #1,873
It’s annoying me now that Gus’s family seemed reluctant to accept much help or even want a photo of him out there.
Not a single close family member has made an appeal.
Why is it all so secret?
 
  • #1,874
Well...

As was reported
Father was angry that it was Police, not the in-laws, who notified him about son's disappearance.
And that it happened so late.

So I guess he was on phone all the time.

JMO

Quote

"It is understood Mr Lamont only found out his child was missing when police woke him up at his Belalie North home,
hours after Gus had vanished."

I can only see it says he was furious "he went missing".
 
  • #1,875
Yes, that was my point. When a child goes missing, a custody battle is often the motive behind it. LE is always going to look to the other parent if they are not in the home. IMO
Exactly, parental abduction would be one possibility for the police to either rule out or rule in.

Imo
 
  • #1,876
Well...

As was reported
Father was angry that it was Police, not the in-laws, who notified him about son's disappearance.
And that it happened so late.

So I guess he was on phone all the time.

JMO

Quote

"It is understood Mr Lamont only found out his child was missing when police woke him up at his Belalie North home,
hours after Gus had vanished."

Well its suspicious if Gus’ mum didn’t try to call the dad and let him know that their son is missing
 
Last edited:
  • #1,877
It’s annoying me now that Gus’s family seemed reluctant to accept much help or even want a photo of him out there.
Not a single close family member has made an appeal.
Why is it all so secret?
It’s weird
I’d love to know what the police really think
 
  • #1,878
It’s annoying me now that Gus’s family seemed reluctant to accept much help or even want a photo of him out there.
Not a single close family member has made an appeal.
Why is it all so secret?
That is not strictly true, as a girl reporting to be Gus' cousin did make somewhat of a public appeal on Tik Tok.
 
  • #1,879
  • #1,880
It’s annoying me now that Gus’s family seemed reluctant to accept much help or even want a photo of him out there.
Not a single close family member has made an appeal.
Why is it all so secret?

I can't speak for them, but I don't believe that throwing their private grief upon the world will make any difference in bringing Gus back. You are annoyed that they aren't making an appeal, but as soon as they speak, they will be criticized for every word that they have spoken.

Rather than feeling annoyed, try to feel mercy for those who are already suffering an unspeakable loss and whose lives have gone to places we know nothing about.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
6,385
Total visitors
6,507

Forum statistics

Threads
633,630
Messages
18,645,331
Members
243,623
Latest member
hannahm324
Back
Top