Found Deceased Australia - Melissa Caddick, 49, Sydney, NSW, 12 Nov 2020 #6

[BlueViolet]

In the will, she left Aspen to a ‘family member’. Maybe AG? You would not leave something to your son that did not even exist.

 

[HelloJohnny]

Wasn’t she given notice in August of ASIC’s interest in her business dealings? It was also August that she returned that investor’s money + $300,000

Sometimes people only fool themselves. Her actions were definitely not rational. But sometimes people continue to lie even when it’s proven to be untrue.

 

[JLZ]

Two questions.... maybe three....

Had AG resigned himself to not fighting any more on Melissa's behalf because he had come to the realization that the allegations of fraud were true??

Or did AG not present at Court for the last hearing, (nor did his / MC's Legal Team attend the last court hearing), because the money to fund the legal battle had run out?????

The shoe/foot had only been found the day before (Sun) and the hearing with ASIC was Monday morning.... and according to Police the family were informed Thursday..... So did AG know MC was most likely deceased, and did not attend?? (Remember ASIC asked for a copy of MC's Last Will and Testament that day as well, so ASIC must have known about the shoe.....)

AK logged in to the Court Hearing as he seems to have done for every hearing...

Has AG also been "ripped off" of what inheritance he may have had from his parents ??? (Assuming both children left equal amounts in their parents will) because of Melissa's actions with the Edgecliff property??

Just "food for thought" really....
All JMO

EPOA ends at death. (But is Melissa legally dead?) I think AG got out as soon as he could because by this stage personally he wasn't on Melissa's side.

 

[HelloJohnny]

In the will, she left Aspen to a ‘family member’. Maybe AG? You would not leave something to your son that did not even exist.

No not normally. However, who knows what her motive was. I’d say she was buttering someone up. Or using it to pacify or appease, in order to further manipulate.

 

[OwlHeart]

Probably not on a watch list (I’m sure there’s certain flags and criteria) the transaction would have definitely been reported by the bank though. But if you haven’t done anything wrong, or not partaking in illegal activities, then it doesn’t really matter. This data is cross matched with other Government agencies too.

Next time just do $9,999 and you'll be fine.

 

[Trooper]

Two questions.... maybe three....

Had AG resigned himself to not fighting any more on Melissa's behalf because he had come to the realization that the allegations of fraud were true??

Or did AG not present at Court for the last hearing, (nor did his / MC's Legal Team attend the last court hearing), because the money to fund the legal battle had run out?????

The shoe/foot had only been found the day before (Sun) and the hearing with ASIC was Monday morning.... and according to Police the family were informed Thursday..... So did AG know MC was most likely deceased, and did not attend?? (Remember ASIC asked for a copy of MC's Last Will and Testament that day as well, so ASIC must have known about the shoe.....)

AK logged in to the Court Hearing as he seems to have done for every hearing...

Has AG also been "ripped off" of what inheritance he may have had from his parents ??? (Assuming both children left equal amounts in their parents will) because of Melissa's actions with the Edgecliff property??

Just "food for thought" really....
All JMO

Q1 of 4.... probably.. he knew he didn't have access to any funds whatsoever, and he had to gear himself up to saying bye-bye to the Audi.. it can take a lot out of a man..

Q2 of 4... most likely. .. no one was going to lend him any money, that's for sure.

Q3 of 4.. I presume in shock.. a big brick wall fell on him, hardly surprising that he didn't turn up, and he had no advisor , also, I still don't think he has one, either..


Q4 of 4.. Yes, he has been totally stripped of all of his presumably shared inheritance off the mother and father. And he has been responsible for their day to day activities and chores as well. There is no way he can retrieve any of it, either for himself or for mum and dad. He will have to somehow get a roof over their combined heads with whatever funds he can manage to extract from some kind federal government org. And good luck with that, pal.

 

[JLZ]

Next time just do $9,999 and you'll be fine.

Stuff it. Let them do the work as punishment for wanting to pry.

 

[minime9]

Hey everyone

Look, I'm still on page 41 catching up but I don't think these questions I'm about to ask have been answered on 42 & 43:

1) who owned the Dover Heights home before MC?

2) someone mentioned casino/gambling transactions were amongst MC's financial records, maybe RedRunner. Can someone elaborate on that please?

I came in on this case at the beginning of February maybe later and there are many things I missed so I'm grateful for the helpful bunch you are

Answers to both questions afaik.

1. Not sure and that information wouldn’t be publicly known.

2. AFAIK there was 1 $80 charge at Star City. May have been an atm withdrawal? It wasn’t a regular thing that showed up on the statements afaik.

 

[Trooper]

In the will, she left Aspen to a ‘family member’. Maybe AG? You would not leave something to your son that did not even exist.

see ,, this is what I mean by Melissa signing off on things that had no meaning whatsoever, either in fact, or in law or in life, generally. .. Obviously, she created that paper for a purpose. To show someone, to get something from them, cash, or narcissistic supply, or sex, or status, something. .anything.. it had nothing to do with actually leaving an article of real estate to a living real person.

Certainly, the brother believed in his heart and soul that she owned that North Fell apartment in Aspen.

 

[SLouTh]

EPOA ends at death. (But is Melissa legally dead?) I think AG got out as soon as he could because by this stage personally he wasn't on Melissa's side.

Yes agree about the EPOA ending on death..... but MC wasn't "dead" at that stage...... and I think a Coroner will have to rule on that?

Unless the family already knew about the shoe by then?? (Which is different to what the Police have publicly said)

But yes, the letter offered by AG's legal team that stated he was not going to challenge the 1% of Dover Heights leads me to believe that he had resigned from fighting the alleged fraud too...

Which is what surprises me about today's Daily Telegraph article stating that the family are going to fight for the apartment....

 

[minime9]

IMO...
I would hedge a bet that the funds were never for rent. It would not surprise me if MC told AG to transfer the funds to her account with the description of ‘rent’, as to not attract unwarranted attention from AUSTRAC, as the banks are legally required to report transactions $10k and greater.

Being on AUSTRAC watch list would have been one of hers greater fear (IMO).

After all this legalisation has been established to combat Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing

Potentially.

Kind of spewing now that my previous posts & information regarding this exact thing have disappeared

 

[JLZ]

Yes agree about the EPOA ending on death..... but MC wasn't "dead" at that stage...... and I think a Coroner will have to rule on that?

Unless the family already knew about the shoe by then?? (Which is different to what the Police have publicly said)

But yes, the letter offered by AG's legal team that stated he was not going to challenge the 1% of Dover Heights leads me to believe that he had resigned from fighting the alleged fraud too...

Which is what surprises me about today's Daily Telegraph article stating that the family are going to fight for the apartment....

BBM. That's not AG's business to decide.

 

[SLouTh]

he had to gear himself up to saying bye-bye to the Audi.. it can take a lot out of a man..

Oh Troop you do make me laugh out loud at times..... I enjoy reading your posts!

 

[Trooper]

Yes agree about the EPOA ending on death..... but MC wasn't "dead" at that stage...... and I think a Coroner will have to rule on that?

Unless the family already knew about the shoe by then?? (Which is different to what the Police have publicly said)

But yes, the letter offered by AG's legal team that stated he was not going to challenge the 1% of Dover Heights leads me to believe that he had resigned from fighting the alleged fraud too...

Which is what surprises me about today's Daily Telegraph article stating that the family are going to fight for the apartment....

Imagine how infuriating that must be to the skinned 'investors /donators'... that must drive them crazy that they have to expend even more money to retrieve what is owed to them, while mum and dad and Bro slouch around a 3 million dollar apartment in Edgecliff,, strolling down to Rushcutters pub for a quick snack...

I don't think so.
They have more chance of getting their one percent out of Dovers Height than they have of digging in forever at Edgecliff.

 

[JLZ]

Potentially.

Kind of spewing now that my previous posts & information regarding this exact thing have disappeared

Some of those deleted threads were accessible to me through a Google search. I might have had to click on cached, I forget.

 

[SLouTh]

BBM. That's not AG's business to decide.

No.... but I cant see him not supporting his parents at this awful time.... IMO

 

[MsLilly]

Which is what surprises me about today's Daily Telegraph article stating that the family are going to fight for the apartment....

The apartment was bought with investor funds....and the apartment is in MC’s name.... so shouldn’t the family be treated like all the other creditors (ie investors) and join the queue for what funds get shared! Why should they be treated differently because they are old and gave MC funds for the apartment.... many of the investors are old and they too gave MC funds for their future!

 

[MsLilly]

Oops... double post.... sorry!

 

[minime9]

Some of those deleted threads were accessible to me through a Google search. I might have had to click on cached, I forget.

Ok I’ll give it a go later when I can get on my desktop. Cheers

 

[SLouTh]

The apartment was bought with investor funds....and the apartment is in MC’s name.... so shouldn’t the family be treated like all the other creditors (ie investors) and join the queue for what funds get shared! Why should they be treated differently because they are old and gave MC funds for the apartment.... any of the investors are old and they too gave MC funds for their future!

Yes agree Ms Lilly.... totally.... hence my surprise at today's article.....